Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENH] Alternative directory organization for raw, derived, and source data #178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions src/02-common-principles.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -109,6 +109,29 @@ these data are to be included:
1. We RECOMMEND including the PDF print-out with the actual sequence parameters
generated by the scanner in the `sourcedata` folder.

Alternatively one can organize their data in the following way

```Text
my_dataset/
sourcedata/
...
rawdata/
dataset_description.json
participants.tsv
sub-01/
sub-02/
...
derivatives/
...
```

In this example **only the `rawdata` subfolder needs to be BIDS compliant**
dataset. This specification does not prescribe anything about the contents of
`sourcedata` and `derivatives` folders in the above example - nor does it
prescribe the `sourcedata`, `derivatives`, or `rawdata` folder names. The above
example is just a convention that can be useful for organizing raw, source, and
derived data while maintaining BIDS compliancy of the raw data folder.

## The Inheritance Principle

Any metadata file (`.json`, `.bvec`, `.tsv`, etc.) may be defined at any
Expand Down