Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert most of #237 and #238 #243

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tetromino
Copy link
Collaborator

As the review of #241 showed, --incompatible_enable_proto_toolchain_resolution is not ready yet; we will re-add support for it in Stardoc when we no longer need to register our own protoc toolchain in Stardoc's MODULE.bazel file.

The only parts of #237 we keep are the rules_jvm_external and rules_proto dep bumps; note that the rules_proto dep bump in turn requires a new dependency on bazel_features when using a Stardoc distro release with --noenable_blzmod.

As the review of bazelbuild#241 showed, --incompatible_enable_proto_toolchain_resolution
is not ready yet; we will re-add support for it in Stardoc when we no
longer need to register our own protoc toolchain in Stardoc's
MODULE.bazel file.

The only parts of bazelbuild#237 we keep are the rules_jvm_external and
rules_proto dep bumps; note that the rules_proto dep bump in turn
requires a new dependency on bazel_features when using a Stardoc distro
release with --noenable_blzmod.
@tetromino tetromino requested review from comius and lberki July 9, 2024 18:11
@tetromino tetromino requested a review from brandjon as a code owner July 9, 2024 18:11
@tetromino tetromino changed the title Revert most of #237 Revert most of #237 and #238 Jul 9, 2024
…atible_enable_proto_toolchain_resolution
@tetromino tetromino merged commit db47c15 into bazelbuild:master Jul 17, 2024
19 checks passed
@tetromino tetromino deleted the revert-237 branch July 17, 2024 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants