chore: remove BUILD rules for building our release artifact

I'll send a follow-up PR to simply use 'git archive' to create it, along with GitHub Actions based release automation following Google security best-practice.

BUILD

@@ -48,17 +48,3 @@ exports_files(
     ]),
     visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
 )
-
-filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = glob([
-        "*.bzl",
-        "*.md",
-    ]) + [
-        "MODULE.bazel",
-        "BUILD",
-        "LICENSE",
-        "WORKSPACE.bzlmod",
-    ],
-    visibility = ["//distro:__pkg__"],
-)

doc_build/BUILD

@@ -26,17 +26,6 @@ load("//:version.bzl", "version")
 
 package(default_package_metadata = ["//:license", "//:package_info"])
 
-filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = [
-        "BUILD",
-    ] + glob([
-        "*.bzl",
-        "*.py",
-    ]),
-    visibility = ["//distro:__pkg__"],
-)
-
 exports_files(
     glob([
         "*.bzl",
@@ -91,8 +80,8 @@ bzl_library(
     name = "lib_of_everything",
     srcs = [
         "//:version.bzl",
-        "//rules:standard_package",
-        "//rules_gathering:standard_package",
+        "//rules:bzl",
+        "//rules_gathering:bzl",
     ],
     visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
 )

licenses/generic/BUILD

@@ -44,11 +44,6 @@ package(
 
 licenses(["notice"])
 
-filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = ["BUILD"],
-)
-
 # "none" should be used for packages which are distributed with no license of
 # any kind. You can use this no-op license as a positive indication that the
 # code's license terms were reviewed, so that linters will not flag it later as

licenses/spdx/BUILD

@@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ package(
 
 licenses(["notice"])
 
-filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = ["BUILD"],
-)
-
 license_kind(
     name = "0BSD",
     conditions = [],

rules/BUILD

@@ -33,12 +33,10 @@ trace(
     visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
 )
 
+# TODO(alexeagle): use gazelle to replace all these with bzl_library
 filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = glob([
-        "**/BUILD",
-        "**/*.bzl",
-    ]),
+    name = "bzl",
+    srcs = glob(["**/*.bzl"]),
 )
 
 # Do not create a bzl_library(). That would create a dependency loop back

rules/private/BUILD

@@ -20,11 +20,6 @@ package(
 
 licenses(["notice"])
 
-filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = glob(["**"]),
-)
-
 # Do not create a bzl_library(). That would create a dependency loop back
 # to bazel-skylib. We export the .bzl files to the documentation maker.
 exports_files(

rules_gathering/BUILD

@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@ package(
     default_visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
 )
 
+# TODO(alexeagle): use gazelle to replace all these with bzl_library
 filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = glob(["**"]),
+    name = "bzl",
+    srcs = glob(["*.bzl"]),
 )
 
 # Do not create a bzl_library(). That would create a dependency loop back

sample_reports/BUILD

@@ -22,11 +22,6 @@ package(
 
 licenses(["notice"])
 
-filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = glob(["**"]),
-)
-
 # Do not create a bzl_library(). That would create a dependency loop back
 # to bazel-skylib. We export the .bzl files to the documentation maker.
 exports_files(

tools/BUILD

@@ -23,12 +23,6 @@ package(
 
 licenses(["notice"])
 
-filegroup(
-    name = "standard_package",
-    srcs = glob(["**"]),
-    visibility = ["//distro:__pkg__"],
-)
-
 exports_files(["diff_test.sh"])
 
 py_binary(

tools/test_helpers.bzl

@@ -60,12 +60,6 @@ def golden_cmd_test(
     """
     actual = name + ".output"
 
-    # There are some cases where tools are provided and exec_tools are provided.
-    # Specifying both in the same genrule, confuses the host vs exec rules,
-    # which prevents python3 from execution.
-    if tools and exec_tools:
-        fail("Only set one: tools or exec_tools.  " +
-             "Setting both confuses python execution mode (host vs exec).")
     native.genrule(
         name = name + "_output",
         srcs = srcs,