Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use kubernetes recommended labels #1168

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2019
Merged

Use kubernetes recommended labels #1168

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2019

Conversation

lcostea
Copy link
Member

@lcostea lcostea commented Feb 23, 2019

Following the discussion over #1035 I made some changes on manifests labels.
This is in sync with the current kubernetes recommended labels:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/common-labels/

Verified it like this: regenerated the manifests with running hack/update-manifests.sh and applied install.yaml on my minikube. Then I installed a redis and the guestbook app with ArgoCD.

The recommended labels are the ones described here:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/common-labels/
The manifests labels should be in sync with the helm chart
Also this is a follow up after the discussion from:
#1035
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 23, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1168 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1168   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.98%   35.98%           
=======================================
  Files          59       59           
  Lines        8564     8564           
=======================================
  Hits         3082     3082           
  Misses       5026     5026           
  Partials      456      456

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d2df9db...1c62e34. Read the comment docs.

@jessesuen
Copy link
Member

I have to admit, I'm pretty confused by their documentation, since it appears to have conflicting information. I think this is the right thing to do but let me internalize their docs. I also have a big rework of the manifests, but will wait until this is in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants