-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Copy improvements #795
Merged
Merged
Copy improvements #795
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think
Total yes votes
really captures what is being shown (which is a % anyways)Users have to know what min. quorum is to have intelligent conversations about a vote e.g.
Alice: "Why didn't this vote pass even though it has more yes than no votes?"
Bob: "The minimum quorum threshold wasn't reached."
I would actually change it to
Min. Quorum progress
since this is how we refer to it in onboarding and the user guide.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think quorum is a very technical term, and even I get really confused by it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@luisivan then it could be explained, maybe with a tooltip next to the term. This is how it is explained in the User Guide:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@luisivan @john-light Last week I had a chat with @lkngtn about Aragon's quorum and how it differs from conventional quorum with the aim of adding clarity to the product on-boarding. He suggested that we could rename 'Quorum' as ‘Minimum approval %’ because it’s more accurate. I personally like it because it might be easier to understand by people that are confused by the definition of quorum in general, and because it's more precise as to how we use it.
I agree with John's idea, we should also offer further details/explanation by using a info popover or tooltip and should be consistent with the ones presented on the product on-boarding redesign.
cc @bpierre @sohkai
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Retracted this change for now, proceeding to merge and will come back to the quorum term in the future