chore: Minor change for log in workflow

[sagar-qa007]

Description

Minor improvement

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11810935173
Commit: 56bd00f
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.IDE
Spec:

---

Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:25:27 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

• Yes
• No

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Enhanced checks for new vulnerabilities in the workflow, improving data validation.
  • Added feedback for cases when no new vulnerabilities are detected, enhancing output clarity.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The workflow file .github/workflows/test-vulnerabilities-data.yml has been updated to improve the detection of new vulnerabilities from Scout and Trivy. The changes include modifying the conditions to check if the vulnerability files contain data by counting lines after the header, and adding feedback for cases where no new vulnerabilities are found. The overall structure of the workflow remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/test-vulnerabilities-data.yml	Updated conditions to check for non-empty vulnerability files by counting lines after the header. Added an else clause for feedback when no vulnerabilities are detected.

Possibly related PRs

• chore: Added scout & trivy scan to github workflow #37022: This PR adds Scout and Trivy scans to the GitHub workflow, which directly relates to the changes made in the main PR that enhance the checks for vulnerabilities detected by these tools.
• chore: New schema change for vulnerabilities test #37204: This PR modifies the same workflow file by removing a step that fetched vulnerability data, which is relevant to the changes in the main PR that enhance the workflow's handling of vulnerability checks.
• chore: Adding step for install #37276: This PR adds a step to check for new vulnerabilities after running the Scout and Trivy scripts, which aligns with the main PR's focus on improving vulnerability detection logic in the workflow.

Suggested labels

ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

• sharat87
• yatinappsmith

In the workflow where we check for flaws,
Scout and Trivy now give clearer calls.
With headers skipped, we count the lines,
Ensuring that our code aligns.
If no new threats are found today,
Feedback is clear, in a friendly way! 🌟

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/test-vulnerabilities-data.yml (1)

76-76: Remove trailing spaces on line 76

There are trailing spaces that should be removed for consistency.

-                  
+

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint

[error] 76-76: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91cf54b and 56bd00f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/test-vulnerabilities-data.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 yamllint

.github/workflows/test-vulnerabilities-data.yml

[error] 76-76: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/test-vulnerabilities-data.yml (2)

68-75: Improved vulnerability detection logic looks good!

The changes properly handle CSV headers and provide clear feedback. The use of tail -n +2 to skip headers is a robust approach.

Also applies to: 77-84

---

68-84: Verify error handling for malformed CSV files

While the current implementation handles valid CSVs well, we should ensure it gracefully handles edge cases.

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint

[error] 76-76: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

---

[error] 84-84: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)