Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Helm - custom service account creation and management #17880
feat: Helm - custom service account creation and management #17880
Changes from 4 commits
fa02860
be299eb
372fed1
45d05ff
9bf581b
dedd6d5
f023c40
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about:
According to: https://helm.sh/docs/chart_best_practices/rbac/#yaml-configuration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've thought about it. That was even my first choice, but then I've noticed that, there was
ServiceAccountName
variable added in the past #15340, so I've implemented new feature as enhancement beside the current solution.I don't want to destroy any configs that can exist somewhere.
@mvoitko and @craig-rueda can you give some more feedback about this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeps you are right, we would break backward compatibility but on the other site, we could maintain both for sometime and prepare a communication about that right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If someone have blocked version on helm in their definition it's OK, but when someone is using "latest" it will brake down deployment (or dependent components).
Supporting two solutions for a while should be quite easy (I'll just add one more conditions in
_helpers
) but this could cause some caveats such as overwriting values ifserviceAccountName
andserviceAccount.name
would be defined in the same time. 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it LGTM. If people are using "latest" in any env that matters, that's generally a bad practice. Using the default of
create: false
seems reasonable to me.