Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The default value of "spark.locality.wait.process" is error. #1232

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

The default value of "spark.locality.wait.process" is error. #1232

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

watermen
Copy link
Contributor

The default value of "spark.locality.wait.process" is error.It is "3000" in the code.
The same to "spark.locality.wait.node" and "spark.locality.wait.rack".

The default value of "spark.locality.wait.process" is error.It is "3000" in the code.
The same to "spark.locality.wait.node" and "spark.locality.wait.rack".
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@vanzin
Copy link
Contributor

vanzin commented Jun 26, 2014

No, the current description is correct. The default value for spark.locality.wait.process is the value of spark.locality.wait, not 3000. The default for spark.locality.wait is 3000, but that is different from what you're saying.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah - the existing documentation is correct here, I think.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

Do you mind closing this for now?

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 87738bf Aug 2, 2014
sunchao pushed a commit to sunchao/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2021
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR cherry-picks the partition evolution commands to Spark 3.2.

### Why are the changes needed?

These changes are needed to support partition evolution in Iceberg.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

This PR adds new isolated commands that will be supported only by Iceberg.

### How was this patch tested?

This PR comes with tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants