-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.5k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[SPARK-13747][SQL] Fix concurrent query with fork-join pool
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Fix this use case, which was already fixed in SPARK-10548 in 1.6 but was broken in master due to #9264: ``` (1 to 100).par.foreach { _ => sc.parallelize(1 to 5).map { i => (i, i) }.toDF("a", "b").count() } ``` This threw `IllegalArgumentException` consistently before this patch. For more detail, see the JIRA. ## How was this patch tested? New test in `SQLExecutionSuite`. Author: Andrew Or <[email protected]> Closes #11586 from andrewor14/fix-concurrent-sql.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
20 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I wonder whether there is some reason to use
asInstanceOf
when something likeval awaitPermission: scala.concurrent.CanAwait = null
seems, at least for me, more readable.