-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[R] duckdb tests fail with duckdb 0.9.1 #38293
Labels
Milestone
Comments
paleolimbot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 17, 2023
### Rationale for this change The test fail with the latest version of duckdb (0.9.1). ### What changes are included in this PR? The test was changed so that it did not depend on non-deterministic behaviour. We sort all of the other expectations involving a group_by to avoid this problem...we hadn't changed this one yet because it didn't fail in any previous version of duckdb. ### Are these changes tested? Yes ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * Closes: #38293 Authored-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]>
raulcd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 17, 2023
### Rationale for this change The test fail with the latest version of duckdb (0.9.1). ### What changes are included in this PR? The test was changed so that it did not depend on non-deterministic behaviour. We sort all of the other expectations involving a group_by to avoid this problem...we hadn't changed this one yet because it didn't fail in any previous version of duckdb. ### Are these changes tested? Yes ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * Closes: #38293 Authored-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]>
JerAguilon
pushed a commit
to JerAguilon/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2023
### Rationale for this change The test fail with the latest version of duckdb (0.9.1). ### What changes are included in this PR? The test was changed so that it did not depend on non-deterministic behaviour. We sort all of the other expectations involving a group_by to avoid this problem...we hadn't changed this one yet because it didn't fail in any previous version of duckdb. ### Are these changes tested? Yes ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * Closes: apache#38293 Authored-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]>
loicalleyne
pushed a commit
to loicalleyne/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2023
### Rationale for this change The test fail with the latest version of duckdb (0.9.1). ### What changes are included in this PR? The test was changed so that it did not depend on non-deterministic behaviour. We sort all of the other expectations involving a group_by to avoid this problem...we hadn't changed this one yet because it didn't fail in any previous version of duckdb. ### Are these changes tested? Yes ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * Closes: apache#38293 Authored-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]>
dgreiss
pushed a commit
to dgreiss/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2024
### Rationale for this change The test fail with the latest version of duckdb (0.9.1). ### What changes are included in this PR? The test was changed so that it did not depend on non-deterministic behaviour. We sort all of the other expectations involving a group_by to avoid this problem...we hadn't changed this one yet because it didn't fail in any previous version of duckdb. ### Are these changes tested? Yes ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * Closes: apache#38293 Authored-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dewey Dunnington <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.
With duckdb 0.9.1 we now see:
I will do a few more investigations to see if this is an arrow problem exposed via a duckdb update or a duckdb problem.
Component(s)
R
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: