-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[C++] Add element-wise power() compute function #27714
Comments
Joris Van den Bossche / @jorisvandenbossche: One behavioural aspect that has come up in pandas is the question about what to do with nulls in case of |
ARF / @ARF1: As a consequence in my opinion, the following should hold: With this convention, if a user wants a different behaviour they can always use Also, I believe explicit is better than implicit... |
Joris Van den Bossche / @jorisvandenbossche: |
Neal Richardson / @nealrichardson: |
Joris Van den Bossche / @jorisvandenbossche: |
ARF / @ARF1: A programmer that understands A programmer that understands It would seem to me the solution is to leave the choice to the user and allow her/him to specify the desired behaviour as an option to If arrow has to specify a unique semantic interpretation of Conversely if arrow standardized on Please feel free to close this issue as a duplicate. I searched for issues relating to |
Joris Van den Bossche / @jorisvandenbossche:
Indeed, if there are different downstream applications that might need either behaviour, an option might be best. But so that's the main reason I brought up the issue. |
It would be nice to have an element-wise
power()
compute function.I.e. in analogy to numpy.power().
Reporter: ARF / @ARF1
Related issues:
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-11871. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: