Skip to content

GH-44273: [C++][Decimal] Use 0E+1 not 0.E+1 for broader compatibility #40684

GH-44273: [C++][Decimal] Use 0E+1 not 0.E+1 for broader compatibility

GH-44273: [C++][Decimal] Use 0E+1 not 0.E+1 for broader compatibility #40684

Triggered via pull request October 2, 2024 00:45
Status Success
Total duration 27m 19s
Artifacts

ruby.yml

on: pull_request
ARM64 macOS 14 GLib & Ruby
7m 59s
ARM64 macOS 14 GLib & Ruby
AMD64 Windows MSVC GLib
4m 45s
AMD64 Windows MSVC GLib
Matrix: ubuntu
Matrix: windows-mingw
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error and 1 warning
ARM64 macOS 14 GLib & Ruby
No available formula with the name "llvm@19". Did you mean llvm@9, llvm, llvm@17, llvm@16, llvm@15, llvm@14, llvm@13, llvm@12 or llvm@11?
AMD64 Ubuntu 22.04 GLib & Ruby
Failed to save: "/usr/bin/tar" failed with error: The process '/usr/bin/tar' failed with exit code 2