-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ec2_vol support MultiAttach disk #365
ec2_vol support MultiAttach disk #365
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's a must have feature. but sadly it collides with #334 which (imho) should be land in main before this one.
@abikouo this PR contains the following merge commits: Please rebase your branch to remove these commits. |
b96f8e7
to
77a60f1
Compare
recheck |
@abikouo thank you for working on this. Can you please rebase your PR? |
@abikouo this PR contains the following merge commits: Please rebase your branch to remove these commits. |
00f8c5e
to
82cbb63
Compare
gate |
Co-authored-by: Markus Bergholz <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally looks good to me, we only need the update to attachment_set to be listed as a breaking change.
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
minor_changes: | |||
- ec2_vol - add parameter ``multi_attach`` to support Multi-Attach on volume creation/update (https://github.com/ansible-collections/amazon.aws/pull/362). | |||
- ec2_vol_info - return ``attachment_set`` is now a list of attachments with Multi-Attach support on disk. (https://github.com/ansible-collections/amazon.aws/pull/362). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a breaking change and needs to be documented as such. Next release is a major release so I think we can get away with this (? @jillr ?)
…ansible-collections#794) Add abort multipart upload and expire obj del markers to s3 lifecycle Depends-On: ansible/ansible-zuul-jobs#1247 SUMMARY Fixes ansible-collections#365 ansible-collections#796 ISSUE TYPE Feature Pull Request COMPONENT NAME s3_lifecycle ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I have not run integration tests yet because of ansible-collections#793. I'm unsure about how to name and structure the new arguments. Do I nest them to match the API, or flatten them to match existing arguments? Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None> Reviewed-by: Matthew Davis <None> Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell <None> Reviewed-by: None <None> Reviewed-by: Markus Bergholz <[email protected]>
…ansible-collections#794) Add abort multipart upload and expire obj del markers to s3 lifecycle Depends-On: ansible/ansible-zuul-jobs#1247 SUMMARY Fixes ansible-collections#365 ansible-collections#796 ISSUE TYPE Feature Pull Request COMPONENT NAME s3_lifecycle ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I have not run integration tests yet because of ansible-collections#793. I'm unsure about how to name and structure the new arguments. Do I nest them to match the API, or flatten them to match existing arguments? Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None> Reviewed-by: Matthew Davis <None> Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell <None> Reviewed-by: None <None> Reviewed-by: Markus Bergholz <[email protected]>
…ansible-collections#794) Add abort multipart upload and expire obj del markers to s3 lifecycle Depends-On: ansible/ansible-zuul-jobs#1247 SUMMARY Fixes ansible-collections#365 ansible-collections#796 ISSUE TYPE Feature Pull Request COMPONENT NAME s3_lifecycle ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I have not run integration tests yet because of ansible-collections#793. I'm unsure about how to name and structure the new arguments. Do I nest them to match the API, or flatten them to match existing arguments? Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None> Reviewed-by: Matthew Davis <None> Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell <None> Reviewed-by: None <None> Reviewed-by: Markus Bergholz <[email protected]>
SUMMARY
new parameter
multi_attach
to support MultiAttach on disk creation/update#225
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
ec2_vol
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION