Optionally use sed extended regex syntax #453
Conversation
| // abc[123]def | ||
|
|
||
| main { | ||
| echo replace_regex("abc123def", "([0-9]+)", "[\1]", true) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test would fail on a machine that does not support the new flag, right? Can we at least write a note somewhere or maybe even skip this test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would prefer to keep the test, because it confirms that on systems which do support -E or -r, the right option is being used. And while Amber may be run on older systems, I doubt that anyone will run cargo test on them. Would you be happy with a comment in the test file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah... I think that we should create some syntax for interfacing commands given different versions and os's. This way we could just run the sed through that interface and never worry
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that we should create some syntax for interfacing commands given different versions and os's
Makes sense, would need to give it some thought, but happy to discuss. In the meantime, I've added this warning comment. Does this resolve your immediate request?
// This will fail on any system where sed does not support extended
// regex syntax, via "-r" on GNU sed and "-E" on all other versions.
hdwalters
force-pushed
the
use-sed-extended-regex
branch
from
29d8456 to
58e20b9
Compare
hdwalters
force-pushed
the
use-sed-extended-regex
branch
from
58e20b9 to
4b40372
Compare
Co-authored-by: Phoenix Himself <[email protected]>
hdwalters
force-pushed
the
use-sed-extended-regex
branch
from
4b40372 to
aed7346
Compare
* Optionally use sed extended regex syntax. * Update src/std/text.ab Co-authored-by: Phoenix Himself <[email protected]> * Add comment stating that sed extended regex may fail on some older Linux variants. * Change regex used to detect GNU sed. * Remove duplicate unsafe from stdlib function. --------- Co-authored-by: Phoenix Himself <[email protected]>
Fixes #444.