Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merging community commits #47

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ahmed-shameem
Copy link

@ahmed-shameem ahmed-shameem commented Nov 24, 2023

This commit cherry-picks community commit from
8cd61d288adfabe1b7f83359eb0abd27382eec08 Avoid unnecessary MemSet call
to
7c2d6f8d3400edab2b91de7765db9ec71235fac9 doc: Add index entry for MERGE SQL command.

Previous PR for cherry-picking from BABEL_3_4_STABLE_PG_15_5 and few community commits to make the engine stable is: #44

Extension side PR: amazon-aurora/babelfish_extensions#54
Cherry-picked from this commit to this commit as done in extension side PR for previous engine pr.
JDBC tests are passing after disabling 2 tests in this specific extensions side PR:

  1. BABEL-4281 in jdbc tests as the cost of the plan has changed
  2. table-variable for the upgrade tests as the cost of the plan has changed

petere and others added 7 commits November 24, 2023 05:04
The variable in question was changed from a struct to a pointer some
time ago (77947c5).  Using MemSet to zero it still works but is
obviously unidiomatic and confusing, so change it to a straight
assignment.

Author: Ranier Vilela <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEudQApCeq4JjW1BdnwU=m=-DvG5WyUik0Yfn3p6UNphiHjj+w@mail.gmail.com
MemSet() with a value other than 0 just falls back to memset(), so the
indirection is unnecessary if the value is constant and not 0.  Since
there is some interest in getting rid of MemSet(), this gets some easy
cases out of the way.  (There are a few MemSet() calls that I didn't
change to maintain the consistency with their surrounding code.)

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEudQApCeq4JjW1BdnwU=m=-DvG5WyUik0Yfn3p6UNphiHjj+w@mail.gmail.com
Previously, the tests were structured so as all the queries whose plans
are checked run first, followed by pattern checks using the full set of
server logs.  This can be problematic when extending the tests, as this
increases query plan overlaps, where two tests finish by having similar
plan outputs potentially invalidating the tests wanted.

The tests are refactored so as log content matches are checked in
isolation of each query run, by grabbing the position of the server logs
before running each query whose plan is generated in the logs.  This
avoids issues when extending the tests, something that would become a
larger problem with a follow-up patch that adds a new GUC in
auto_explain to control the size of the each parameter logged.

Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup() have been respectively renamed to
pg_backup_start() and pg_backup_stop() as of 39969e2, but a few comments
did not get the call.

Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YrqGlj1+4DF3dbZ/@paquier.xyz
Previously, we trusted the OS not to report EEXIST unless we'd passed in
IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL or O_CREAT | O_EXCL, as appropriate.  Solaris's
shm_open() can in fact do that, causing us to crash because we didn't
ereport and then we blithely assumed the mapping was successful.

Let's treat EEXIST just like any other error, unless we're actually
trying to create a new segment.  This applies to shm_open(), where this
behavior has been seen, and also to the equivalent operations for our
sysv and mmap modes just on principle.

Based on the underlying reason for the error, namely contention on a
lock file managed by Solaris librt for each distinct name, this problem
is only likely to happen on 15 and later, because the new shared memory
stats system produces shm_open() calls for the same path from
potentially large numbers of backends concurrently during
authentication.  Earlier releases only shared memory segments between a
small number of parallel workers under one Gather node.  You could
probably hit it if you tried hard enough though, and we should have been
more defensive in the first place.  Therefore, back-patch to all
supported releases.

Per build farm animal margay.  This isn't the end of the story, though,
it just changes random crashes into random "File exists" errors; more
work needed for a green build farm.

Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKqKrCV5xKWfh9rnm%3Do%3DDwZLTLtnsj_XpUi9g5%3DV%2B9oyg%40mail.gmail.com
Add link to the description of lock levels to avoid confusing "shared locks"
with SHARE locks.

Florin Irion

Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tom Lane, and Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]
Back-patch to v15, where MERGE command was supported.

Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
@ahmed-shameem ahmed-shameem marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2023 11:19
@ahmed-shameem ahmed-shameem deleted the pg16-cherry-pick-bff-1 branch November 24, 2023 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants