Entitlements api tests #384
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce several new GraphQL mutations and queries, enhancing the functionality related to license management and user entitlements. Notably, two mutations, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (49)
test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts (3)
41-42: Use 'const' instead of 'let' for variables that are never reassignedAccording to static analysis, variables
spaceNameandorgNameare never reassigned. Usingconstinstead ofletimproves code clarity and prevents accidental reassignments.Apply this diff:
-let spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; -let orgName = `org-name-${uniqueId}`; +const spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; +const orgName = `org-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 41-41: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 42-42: 'orgName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
48-49: Ensure consistent spelling of 'license'The variable
licencePlanPlususes 'licence' instead of 'license'. For consistency, consider renaming it tolicensePlanPlus.Apply this diff:
-const licencePlanPlus = await getLicensePlanByName('ACCOUNT_LICENSE_PLUS'); +const licensePlanPlus = await getLicensePlanByName('ACCOUNT_LICENSE_PLUS'); -accountLicensePlusId = licencePlanPlus[0].id; +accountLicensePlusId = licensePlanPlus[0].id;
85-88: Review redundant assertions in test casesIn your test assertions, both
toEqualandexpect.arrayContainingare used on the same arrays. This may be redundant sincetoEqualchecks for exact equality, which includes all elements and order, whileexpect.arrayContainingchecks if the array contains the specified elements regardless of order.Consider removing one of the assertions if they serve the same purpose. If the order matters,
toEqualsuffices. If only certain elements are important, useexpect.arrayContaining.Also applies to: 114-117
graphql/queries/platform/getPlatformLicensePlans.graphql (1)
6-6: Document the LicensePlanData fragment dependency.The query depends on an external fragment
LicensePlanData. Consider adding a comment to document this dependency and its location.+# Depends on fragments/LicensePlanData.graphql query GetPlatformLicensePlans {graphql/mutations/platfrom/deleteInnovationPack.graphql (1)
1-1: Add documentation comments for the mutationConsider adding documentation comments to describe:
- The purpose of this mutation
- Required permissions
- Possible error scenarios
- Side effects of deletion
+# Deletes an innovation pack by its ID. +# Requires platform admin permissions. +# Throws an error if the pack doesn't exist or is currently in use. mutation deleteInnovationPack($innovationPackId: UUID_NAMEID!) {graphql/queries/account/getAccountMainEntities.graphql (1)
3-12: Consider adding pagination and error handling fields.While the current implementation works for basic testing, consider these improvements for production readiness:
- Add pagination for collections that could grow large (spaces, innovationPacks, virtualContributors)
- Include error handling fields to capture potential issues
- Consider adding a totalCount field for each collection
Here's a suggested enhancement:
query GetAccountMainEntities($accountId: UUID_NAMEID!) { account(ID: $accountId) { spaces { + totalCount + pageInfo { + hasNextPage + endCursor + } + items { id + } } innovationPacks { + totalCount + pageInfo { + hasNextPage + endCursor + } + items { id + } } virtualContributors { + totalCount + pageInfo { + hasNextPage + endCursor + } + items { id + } } } }graphql/fragments/license/assignLicensePlanToAccount.graphql (1)
12-15: Consider returning more meaningful fields.The current response only returns
idand__typename. Consider returning additional fields that would be useful for the client, such as:
- Assignment status/confirmation
- License plan details
- Assignment timestamp
- Validity period
graphql/fragments/license/revokeLicensePlanFromAccount.graphql (3)
1-5: Consider adding error handling fields to the response.While the mutation parameters are well-defined, consider adding error handling fields to handle cases like:
- Invalid license plan ID
- Non-existent account
- Already revoked license
Add error handling fields to the response:
mutation RevokeLicensePlanFromAccount( $licensePlanId: UUID! $accountId: UUID! $licensingId: UUID! ) { revokeLicensePlanFromAccount( planData: { accountID: $accountId licensePlanID: $licensePlanId licensingID: $licensingId } ) { id __typename + success + errors { + code + message + } } }
7-11: Maintain consistent naming conventions.The input field names use inconsistent casing compared to the parameters:
accountIDvsaccountIdlicensePlanIDvslicensePlanIdlicensingIDvslicensingIdConsider following GraphQL naming conventions by using camelCase consistently.
planData: { - accountID: $accountId - licensePlanID: $licensePlanId - licensingID: $licensingId + accountId: $accountId + licensePlanId: $licensePlanId + licensingId: $licensingId }
13-15: Consider adding more informative return fields.The current response only includes
idand__typename. Consider adding fields that provide more context about the revocation:
- Revocation timestamp
- Revoked by (user/system)
- License plan details
) { id __typename + revokedAt + revokedBy { + id + name + } + licensePlan { + name + type + } }test/functional-api/account/account.params.request.ts (1)
7-7: Consider documenting the security implications of the default GLOBAL_ADMIN role.While using GLOBAL_ADMIN as default role might be convenient for testing, it could mask permission-related issues. Consider adding a comment explaining this choice and its implications for test coverage.
Add a comment above the function:
+// Note: Default GLOBAL_ADMIN role ensures maximum access for basic testing. +// For comprehensive testing, consider adding specific test cases with restricted roles. export const getAccountMainEntities = async (graphql/queries/entitlements/organizataionEntitlementsQuery.graphql (3)
4-7: Consider adding more subscription fields and pagination.The current subscription fields might be insufficient for complete subscription management. Consider adding:
- Subscription status
- Start date
- Pagination for handling multiple subscriptions
subscriptions { + pageInfo { + hasNextPage + endCursor + } + edges { + node { expires name + status + startDate + } + } }
8-10: Reduce duplication using GraphQL fragment.The
authorization { myPrivileges }pattern appears multiple times. Consider using a fragment to improve maintainability.+fragment AuthorizationFields on Authorization { + myPrivileges +} query OrganizationEntitlementsQuery($ID: UUID_NAMEID!) { organization(ID: $ID) { account { authorization { - myPrivileges + ...AuthorizationFields } license { authorization { - myPrivileges + ...AuthorizationFields } # ... } spaces { license { authorization { - myPrivileges + ...AuthorizationFields } } } } } }Also applies to: 12-14, 28-30
26-41: Consider pagination and query complexity for spaces.The deeply nested structure without pagination could lead to performance issues when dealing with organizations that have many spaces.
Consider implementing:
- Pagination for spaces
- Allowing clients to specify which license details they need using GraphQL directives
spaces { + pageInfo { + hasNextPage + endCursor + } + edges { + node { license @include(if: $includeLicenseDetails) { # ... existing fields } + } + } }graphql/queries/entitlements/myEntitlementsQuery.graphql (3)
1-4: Consider implementing field selection to optimize query performanceWhile the query structure is well-organized, it fetches a significant amount of nested data. Consider implementing field selection through variables to allow clients to request only the needed fields, reducing response size and improving performance.
Example implementation:
query MyEntitlementsQuery($includeSubscriptions: Boolean!, $includeSpaces: Boolean!) { me { user { account { subscriptions @include(if: $includeSubscriptions) { # ... subscription fields } # ... other fields spaces @include(if: $includeSpaces) { # ... space fields } } } } }
5-8: Consider enhancing subscription fields and adding paginationThe current subscription fields might be insufficient for comprehensive subscription management. Consider:
- Adding status field to track active/inactive subscriptions
- Including subscription type or tier information
- Implementing pagination for subscriptions array
subscriptions(first: $first, after: $after) { edges { node { expires name status type } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } }
16-24: Consider adding metadata fields for entitlements trackingThe entitlements structure captures essential information but could benefit from additional metadata fields for better tracking and auditing.
entitlements { type isAvailable enabled limit usage dataType # Consider adding: lastUpdated nextResetDate usageHistory { timestamp value } }test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-request.params.ts (1)
1-34: Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.These testing utilities would benefit from JSDoc comments describing:
- Purpose of each function
- Expected parameters and return types
- Example usage
- Possible error scenarios
Example documentation:
/** * Fetches the current user's entitlements using GraphQL. * @param userRole - The role to use for the query. Defaults to GLOBAL_ADMIN. * @returns Promise containing the entitlements data * @throws GraphQLError if the query fails * @example * const entitlements = await getMyEntitlementsQuery(TestUser.REGULAR_USER); */test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation_pack.request.params.ts (1)
29-45: Consider adding input validation for innovationPackId.The implementation follows good practices and maintains consistency with other functions. However, it might be beneficial to add validation for the
innovationPackIdparameter to prevent potential issues with invalid IDs.Consider adding validation:
export const deleteInnovationPack = async ( innovationPackId: string, userRole: TestUser = TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN ) => { + if (!innovationPackId?.trim()) { + throw new Error('Innovation Pack ID is required'); + } const graphqlClient = getGraphqlClient(); const callback = (authToken: string | undefined) =>test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack-with-templates.ts (2)
Line range hint
24-28: Function parameters and usage look goodThe migration to
createInnovationPackmaintains the same parameter structure and usage pattern.Fix formatting to match project style
The function call parameters should be on a single line according to the project's style guide.
- const packData = await createInnovationPack( - packName, - packNameId, - providerId - ); + const packData = await createInnovationPack(packName, packNameId, providerId);
Line range hint
35-37: Enhance error handling and add entity validationThe current error handling could be more robust:
- Consider adding specific error types and handling
- Add validation to ensure created entities exist
- Consider logging more context in error scenarios
main().catch(error => { - console.error(error); + console.error('Failed to create innovation pack:', { + error, + packName, + packNameId, + providerId + }); + process.exit(1); });test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack.it-spec.ts (4)
Line range hint
32-36: Fix formatting according to project standardsUpdate the function call formatting to match the project's style guide:
- const packData = await createInnovationPack( - packName, - packNameId, - orgId - ); + const packData = await createInnovationPack(packName, packNameId, orgId);
Line range hint
77-77: Strengthen test assertionsThe current assertion
expect(200).toBe(200)is trivial and doesn't verify any actual functionality. Consider adding meaningful assertions to verify:
- The innovation pack was created successfully
- The correct number of templates were created
- The templates have the expected properties
Example improvement:
expect(packData?.data?.createInnovationPack).toBeTruthy(); expect(packData?.data?.createInnovationPack?.templatesSet?.id).toBeTruthy(); // Add assertions for template creation results
Line range hint
38-73: Consider optimizing template creationThe current implementation creates templates sequentially and lacks error handling. Consider these improvements:
- Use Promise.all for parallel template creation
- Add error handling
- Verify template creation results
Example improvement:
const templatePromises = [ whiteboardTemplateValues1, whiteboardTemplateValues2, // ... other values ].map(values => createWhiteboardTemplate( templateSetId, whiteboardTemplateTitle, values ).catch(error => { console.error(`Failed to create template: ${error}`); throw error; }) ); const results = await Promise.all(templatePromises); expect(results).toHaveLength(6);
Re-enable organization cleanup to prevent test data accumulation
The test file creates an organization and multiple whiteboard templates but doesn't clean up after the tests. Other test files in the codebase consistently use
afterAllcleanup withdeleteOrganization, so this should follow the same pattern. There's no documented reason for disabling the cleanup.
- Re-enable the commented cleanup at line 27:
afterAll(async () => await deleteOrganization(orgId));🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
27-27: Consider enabling organization cleanupThe commented-out
afterAllcleanup could lead to test data accumulation. Consider re-enabling it or documenting why it's disabled.
Let me check the actual cleanup implementation in these files to verify if there's a pattern we should follow.
Let me check the specific test file to understand the test structure and verify if there's any documented reason for the commented cleanup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if other test files properly clean up their organizations rg -l "deleteOrganization" test/functional-api/Length of output: 4761
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the cleanup patterns in test files rg "afterAll.*deleteOrganization" -A 2 test/functional-api/Length of output: 1283
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the innovation pack test file cat test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack.it-spec.tsLength of output: 2556
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts (2)
37-37: Document why the test suite is skippedThe test suite is currently skipped. Please add a comment explaining why it's skipped and when it should be enabled.
39-73: Improve test structure and error handlingThe test could benefit from several improvements:
- Add error handling for the API calls
- Verify the space creation was successful
- Consider using beforeAll/afterAll for setup/cleanup
Here's a suggested structure:
let spaceId: string; let licensePlanIdSpace: string; beforeAll(async () => { // Get license plan const getLicensePlanSpace = await getLicensePlanByName('SPACE_LICENSE_PLUS'); expect(getLicensePlanSpace).toBeDefined(); licensePlanIdSpace = getLicensePlanSpace[0].id; // Create space const createSpace = await createSpaceBasicData( spaceName, spaceName, users.nonSpaceMember.accountId, TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER ); expect(createSpace.data?.createSpace).toBeDefined(); spaceId = createSpace.data?.createSpace.id; }); afterAll(async () => { if (spaceId) { const revokeResult = await revokeLicensePlanFromSpace( spaceId, licensePlanIdSpace, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN ); expect(revokeResult.data?.revokeLicensePlanFromSpace).toBeTruthy(); await deleteSpace(spaceId); } }); test('Add License Plus to space', async () => { // Assign license const assignResult = await assignLicensePlanToSpace(spaceId, licensePlanIdSpace); expect(assignResult).toBeDefined(); // Verify entitlements const response = await getMyEntitlementsQuery(TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER); expect(response.data?.me.user?.account?.spaces?.[0].license.id).toEqual(licensePlanIdSpace); });test/functional-api/license/license.params.request.ts (3)
70-87: Consider extracting licensingID retrieval logic.The licensingID retrieval logic is duplicated across multiple functions. Consider extracting it into a shared helper function.
const getLicensingId = async (): Promise<string> => { const res = await getLicensePlans(); return res.data?.platform.licensingFramework.id ?? ''; };
89-133: Standardize parameter naming convention.There's inconsistency in parameter naming:
- Space functions use
licensePlanID(uppercase 'ID')- Account functions use
licensePlanId(lowercase 'Id')Choose one convention and apply it consistently across all functions.
Line range hint
1-133: Consider adding unit tests for these test utilities.These functions are critical test utilities that other tests depend on. To ensure reliability, consider adding unit tests that verify:
- Correct parameter passing to GraphQL mutations
- Proper error handling
- Edge cases in license plan filtering
Would you like me to help create a test suite for these utility functions?
test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts (2)
15-17: Consider using a more reliable unique identifier generationThe current random number approach could potentially generate duplicate values. Consider using a more reliable method like UUID.
-const uniqueId = Math.random() - .toString(12) - .slice(-6); +const uniqueId = Date.now().toString(36) + Math.random().toString(36).slice(2);
19-20: Consider moving test data setup into the test scopeGlobal variables can lead to test interdependency. Consider moving these into the test scope or using beforeEach to reset state.
test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts (2)
19-21: Consider using a more reliable unique identifier generation methodThe current implementation using
Math.random()for generating test identifiers could potentially lead to collisions. Consider using a more reliable method like UUID v4.-const uniqueId = Math.random() - .toString(12) - .slice(-6); +import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid'; +const uniqueId = uuidv4().slice(0, 6);
71-78: Improve test case descriptions and formatting
- The test description could be more specific about what's being tested
- The test.each table formatting needs adjustment
test.each` - vcName | availableEntitlements | error - ${`vc1-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} - ${`vc2-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} - ${`vc3-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} + vcName | availableEntitlements | error + ${`vc1-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} + ${`vc2-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} + ${`vc3-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} `( - 'User: VC campaign has license $availableEntitlements to creates a vc with name: $vcName', + 'should successfully create VC "$vcName" when user has required entitlements: $availableEntitlements',🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 73-73: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 74-74: Replace
····with······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 75-75: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts (6)
15-17: Consider using a more robust unique identifier generationThe current implementation using
Math.random()could potentially lead to collisions. Consider using UUID v4 or a similar robust unique identifier generation method.-const uniqueId = Math.random() - .toString(12) - .slice(-6); +import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid'; +const uniqueId = uuidv4().slice(0, 6);
19-19: Use const for immutable variable declarationThe
spaceNamevariable is never reassigned and should be declared usingconst.-let spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; +const spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 19-19: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
41-56: Consider adding error handling to cleanupThe cleanup process in
afterAllshould handle potential failures gracefully to ensure test isolation.afterAll(async () => { + try { const spaceData = await getAccountMainEntities( users.nonSpaceMember.accountId, TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER ); const spaces = spaceData.data?.account?.spaces; for (const space of spaces || []) { const spaceId = space.id; - await deleteSpace(spaceId, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN); + await deleteSpace(spaceId, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN).catch(console.error); } await removePlatformRoleFromUser( users.nonSpaceMember.id, PlatformRole.VcCampaign ); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Cleanup failed:', error); + throw error; + } });
58-84: Enhance test coverage with more diverse test casesThe current test cases only vary the space name but maintain identical entitlements and error expectations. Consider adding test cases that:
- Test different entitlement combinations
- Include negative test cases
- Test boundary conditions
test.each` spaceName | availableEntitlements | error ${`space1-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} ${`space2-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} ${`space3-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} + ${`space4-${uniqueId}`} | ${withoutCreateSpace}| ${'Insufficient privileges'} + ${``} | ${allPrivileges} | ${'Invalid space name'} + ${`a`.repeat(256)} | ${allPrivileges} | ${'Space name too long'} `🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 60-60: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace
····with······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
109-140: Improve variable naming and add explicit assertionsThe test could be improved with better variable naming and more comprehensive assertions.
-const a = await deleteSpace(spaceId0, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN); +const deleteSpaceResult = await deleteSpace(spaceId0, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN); +expect(deleteSpaceResult).toBeDefined(); +expect(deleteSpaceResult.error).toBeUndefined(); const responseAfter = await getMyEntitlementsQuery( TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER ); +expect(responseAfter.error).toBeUndefined(); const createSpace = await createSpaceBasicData( spaceName, spaceName, users.nonSpaceMember.accountId, TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER ); spaceId = createSpace.data?.createSpace.id ?? ''; +expect(spaceId).toBeTruthy();
21-142: Consider improving test isolation and organizationThe test suite could benefit from better isolation and organization:
- Consider using a test fixture to manage the test setup and teardown
- Group related test cases into separate describe blocks
- Use beforeEach/afterEach for better test isolation
Example structure:
describe('Space Entitlements', () => { let testFixture: TestFixture; beforeEach(async () => { testFixture = await TestFixture.setup(); }); afterEach(async () => { await testFixture.cleanup(); }); describe('Basic Space Creation', () => { // Your parameterized tests }); describe('License Limits', () => { // Your license limit tests }); describe('License Recovery', () => { // Your recovery tests }); });🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 60-60: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace
····with······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements-data.ts (3)
1-62: Consider adding TypeScript interfaces for better type safety.The structure for
organizationAccountNoLicensesis well-defined and consistent. However, adding TypeScript interfaces would improve type safety and documentation.Consider adding interfaces like this at the beginning of the file:
interface Entitlement { type: string; isAvailable: boolean; enabled: boolean; limit: number; usage: number; dataType: 'LIMIT' | 'FLAG'; } interface OrganizationAccount { subscriptions: Array<{expires: null | string, name: string}>; authorization: { myPrivileges: string[]; }; license: { type: string; authorization: { myPrivileges: string[]; }; availableEntitlements: string[]; entitlements: Entitlement[]; }; spaces: any[]; // Define specific space interface if needed }
222-271: Document the usage of -1 in space flag entitlements.All space flag entitlements use -1 for usage, which needs explanation. Is this a special value indicating "not applicable" for flag-type entitlements?
Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of -1 usage value for flags, or use a more semantic value like
nullif appropriate.
215-274: Consider simplifying the space license structure.The deeply nested structure for space licenses could be simplified for better maintainability.
Consider extracting the space license configuration into a separate constant:
const SPACE_LICENSE_CONFIG = { type: 'SPACE', authorization: { myPrivileges: ['READ', 'CREATE', 'UPDATE', 'DELETE', 'GRANT'], }, entitlements: [ // ... entitlements array ], }; // Then in the main constant: spaces: [{ license: SPACE_LICENSE_CONFIG }]test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-data.ts (1)
1-275: Add TypeScript interfaces and documentation for the test data structureThe test data is well-structured but lacks type definitions and documentation. Consider adding:
- TypeScript interfaces defining the shape of the account, license, and entitlement objects
- JSDoc comments explaining the purpose of each constant and its scenario
Example structure:
/** Represents an account's entitlement configuration */ interface AccountEntitlements { subscriptions: Array<{ expires: string | null; name: string; }>; authorization: { myPrivileges: string[]; }; license: LicenseConfig; spaces: SpaceConfig[]; } /** Represents a license configuration */ interface LicenseConfig { type: 'ACCOUNT' | 'SPACE'; authorization: { myPrivileges: string[]; }; availableEntitlements?: string[]; entitlements: EntitlementConfig[]; }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 224-224: Replace
··"dataType":·"FLAG"withdataType:·'FLAG'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 224-224: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 224-224: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 225-225: Replace
··············"enabled"with············enabled(prettier/prettier)
[error] 225-225: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 226-226: Replace
··············"isAvailable"with············isAvailable(prettier/prettier)
[error] 226-226: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 227-227: Replace
··············"limit"with············limit(prettier/prettier)
[error] 227-227: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 228-228: Replace
··"type":·"SPACE_PLUS"withtype:·'SPACE_PLUS'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 228-228: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 228-228: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 229-229: Replace
··"usage":·-1withusage:·-1,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 229-229: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 232-232: Replace
··"dataType":·"FLAG"withdataType:·'FLAG'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 232-232: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 232-232: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 233-233: Replace
··"enabled"withenabled(prettier/prettier)
[error] 233-233: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 234-234: Replace
··"isAvailable"withisAvailable(prettier/prettier)
[error] 234-234: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 235-235: Replace
··············"limit"with············limit(prettier/prettier)
[error] 235-235: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 236-236: Replace
··"type":·"SPACE_FLAG_WHITEBOARD_MULTI_USER"withtype:·'SPACE_FLAG_WHITEBOARD_MULTI_USER'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 236-236: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 236-236: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 237-237: Replace
··"usage":·-1withusage:·-1,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 237-237: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 240-240: Replace
··"dataType":·"FLAG"withdataType:·'FLAG'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 240-240: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 240-240: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 241-241: Replace
··············"enabled"with············enabled(prettier/prettier)
[error] 241-241: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 242-242: Replace
··············"isAvailable"with············isAvailable(prettier/prettier)
[error] 242-242: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 243-243: Replace
··············"limit"with············limit(prettier/prettier)
[error] 243-243: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 244-244: Replace
··"type":·"SPACE_FLAG_SAVE_AS_TEMPLATE"withtype:·'SPACE_FLAG_SAVE_AS_TEMPLATE'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 244-244: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 244-244: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 245-245: Replace
··············"usage":·-1with············usage:·-1,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 245-245: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 248-248: Replace
··············"dataType":·"FLAG"with············dataType:·'FLAG'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 248-248: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 248-248: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 249-249: Replace
··············"enabled"with············enabled(prettier/prettier)
[error] 249-249: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 250-250: Replace
··"isAvailable"withisAvailable(prettier/prettier)
[error] 250-250: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 251-251: Replace
··"limit"withlimit(prettier/prettier)
[error] 251-251: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 252-252: Replace
··············"type":·"SPACE_PREMIUM"with············type:·'SPACE_PREMIUM'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 252-252: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 252-252: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 253-253: Replace
··"usage":·-1withusage:·-1,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 253-253: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 256-256: Replace
··"dataType":·"FLAG"withdataType:·'FLAG'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 256-256: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 256-256: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 257-257: Replace
··"enabled"withenabled(prettier/prettier)
[error] 257-257: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 258-258: Replace
··············"isAvailable"with············isAvailable(prettier/prettier)
[error] 258-258: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 259-259: Replace
··············"limit"with············limit(prettier/prettier)
[error] 259-259: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 260-260: Replace
··"type":·"SPACE_FLAG_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ACCESS"withtype:·'SPACE_FLAG_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ACCESS'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 260-260: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 260-260: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 261-261: Replace
··"usage":·-1withusage:·-1,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 261-261: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 264-264: Replace
··"dataType":·"FLAG"withdataType:·'FLAG'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 264-264: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 264-264: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 265-265: Replace
··"enabled"withenabled(prettier/prettier)
[error] 265-265: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 266-266: Replace
··"isAvailable"withisAvailable(prettier/prettier)
[error] 266-266: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 267-267: Replace
··"limit"withlimit(prettier/prettier)
[error] 267-267: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 268-268: Replace
··"type":·"SPACE_FREE"withtype:·'SPACE_FREE'(prettier/prettier)
[error] 268-268: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 268-268: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 269-269: Replace
··"usage":·-1withusage:·-1,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 269-269: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 270-270: Insert
,(prettier/prettier)
[error] 271-271: Replace
]with··],(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts (3)
32-32: Useconstfor immutable variable.The
spaceNamevariable is never reassigned after initialization, so it should be declared withconstinstead oflet.-let spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; +const spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 32-32: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
28-30: Improve uniqueId generation for better readability.The current implementation of uniqueId generation could be simplified for better readability.
-const uniqueId = Math.random() - .toString(12) - .slice(-6); +const uniqueId = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7);
38-263: Improve test organization and reduce code duplication.The test suite could be better organized to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability:
- Extract common setup/cleanup logic into beforeAll/afterAll hooks
- Use shared helper functions for common operations
- Group related tests using describe blocks consistently
Consider refactoring the test suite structure like this:
describe('User Account Authorization and License privileges', () => { let spaceId: string; let vcId: string; let innovationPackId: string; const setupResources = async () => { // Extract common resource creation logic }; const cleanupResources = async () => { // Extract common cleanup logic }; describe('No License Tests', () => { // No license tests }); describe('VC Campaign License Tests', () => { beforeAll(async () => { await assignPlatformRoleToUser(users.nonSpaceMember.id, PlatformRole.VcCampaign); }); afterAll(async () => { await cleanupResources(); }); // VC campaign tests }); // Similar structure for Beta Tester tests });test/functional-api/journey/space/space.request.params.ts (1)
10-10: Fix formatting issuesPlease address the following formatting issues:
- Line 10: Format imports on separate lines
- Line 43: Add space after licensePlanID
-import { getLicensePlanByName, getLicensePlans } from '@test/functional-api/license/license.params.request'; +import { + getLicensePlanByName, + getLicensePlans, +} from '@test/functional-api/license/license.params.request'; - // licensePlanID, + // licensePlanID,Also applies to: 43-43
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 10-10: Replace
·getLicensePlanByName,·getLicensePlans·with⏎··getLicensePlanByName,⏎··getLicensePlans,⏎(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/journey/space/space-platform-settings.it-spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
183-183: Review commented assertion.The commented assertion
//expect(dataBeforeVisibilityChange).toEqual(dataAfterVisibilityChange);should either be:
- Uncommented if it's a valid test case
- Removed if it's no longer needed
- Updated with a TODO comment explaining why it's commented out
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
test/generated/alkemio-schema.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**test/generated/graphql.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
graphql/fragments/license/assignLicensePlanToAccount.graphql(1 hunks)graphql/fragments/license/revokeLicensePlanFromAccount.graphql(1 hunks)graphql/mutations/platfrom/deleteInnovationPack.graphql(1 hunks)graphql/queries/account/getAccountMainEntities.graphql(1 hunks)graphql/queries/entitlements/myEntitlementsQuery.graphql(1 hunks)graphql/queries/entitlements/organizataionEntitlementsQuery.graphql(1 hunks)graphql/queries/platform/getPlatformLicensePlans.graphql(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)test/config/jest.config.entitlements.js(1 hunks)test/functional-api/account/account.params.request.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-data.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-request.params.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements-data.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack-with-templates.ts(2 hunks)test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack.it-spec.ts(2 hunks)test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation_pack.request.params.ts(2 hunks)test/functional-api/journey/space/space-platform-settings.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/journey/space/space.request.params.ts(5 hunks)test/functional-api/license/license.params.request.ts(3 hunks)test/utils/mutations/authorization-platform-mutation.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- test/config/jest.config.entitlements.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-data.ts
[error] 224-224: Replace ··"dataType":·"FLAG" with dataType:·'FLAG'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 224-224: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 224-224: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 225-225: Replace ··············"enabled" with ············enabled
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 225-225: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 226-226: Replace ··············"isAvailable" with ············isAvailable
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 226-226: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 227-227: Replace ··············"limit" with ············limit
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 227-227: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 228-228: Replace ··"type":·"SPACE_PLUS" with type:·'SPACE_PLUS'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 228-228: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 228-228: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 229-229: Replace ··"usage":·-1 with usage:·-1,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 229-229: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 232-232: Replace ··"dataType":·"FLAG" with dataType:·'FLAG'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 232-232: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 232-232: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 233-233: Replace ··"enabled" with enabled
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 233-233: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 234-234: Replace ··"isAvailable" with isAvailable
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 234-234: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 235-235: Replace ··············"limit" with ············limit
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 235-235: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 236-236: Replace ··"type":·"SPACE_FLAG_WHITEBOARD_MULTI_USER" with type:·'SPACE_FLAG_WHITEBOARD_MULTI_USER'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 236-236: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 236-236: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 237-237: Replace ··"usage":·-1 with usage:·-1,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 237-237: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 240-240: Replace ··"dataType":·"FLAG" with dataType:·'FLAG'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 240-240: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 240-240: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 241-241: Replace ··············"enabled" with ············enabled
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 241-241: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 242-242: Replace ··············"isAvailable" with ············isAvailable
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 242-242: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 243-243: Replace ··············"limit" with ············limit
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 243-243: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 244-244: Replace ··"type":·"SPACE_FLAG_SAVE_AS_TEMPLATE" with type:·'SPACE_FLAG_SAVE_AS_TEMPLATE'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 244-244: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 244-244: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 245-245: Replace ··············"usage":·-1 with ············usage:·-1,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 245-245: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 248-248: Replace ··············"dataType":·"FLAG" with ············dataType:·'FLAG'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 248-248: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 248-248: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 249-249: Replace ··············"enabled" with ············enabled
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 249-249: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 250-250: Replace ··"isAvailable" with isAvailable
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 250-250: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 251-251: Replace ··"limit" with limit
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 251-251: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 252-252: Replace ··············"type":·"SPACE_PREMIUM" with ············type:·'SPACE_PREMIUM'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 252-252: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 252-252: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 253-253: Replace ··"usage":·-1 with usage:·-1,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 253-253: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 256-256: Replace ··"dataType":·"FLAG" with dataType:·'FLAG'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 256-256: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 256-256: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 257-257: Replace ··"enabled" with enabled
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 257-257: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 258-258: Replace ··············"isAvailable" with ············isAvailable
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 258-258: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 259-259: Replace ··············"limit" with ············limit
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 259-259: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 260-260: Replace ··"type":·"SPACE_FLAG_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ACCESS" with type:·'SPACE_FLAG_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR_ACCESS'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 260-260: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 260-260: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 261-261: Replace ··"usage":·-1 with usage:·-1,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 261-261: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 264-264: Replace ··"dataType":·"FLAG" with dataType:·'FLAG'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 264-264: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 264-264: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 265-265: Replace ··"enabled" with enabled
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 265-265: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 266-266: Replace ··"isAvailable" with isAvailable
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 266-266: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 267-267: Replace ··"limit" with limit
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 267-267: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 268-268: Replace ··"type":·"SPACE_FREE" with type:·'SPACE_FREE'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 268-268: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 268-268: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 269-269: Replace ··"usage":·-1 with usage:·-1,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 269-269: Strings must use singlequote.
(quotes)
[error] 270-270: Insert ,
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 271-271: Replace ] with ··],
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
[error] 61-61: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Replace ···· with ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 63-63: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
[error] 27-27: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 28-28: 'licensePlanIdAccountPlus' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
[error] 41-41: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 42-42: 'orgName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
[error] 19-19: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 60-60: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace ···· with ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
[error] 32-32: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
[error] 22-22: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 73-73: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 74-74: Replace ···· with ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 75-75: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack-with-templates.ts
[error] 24-28: Replace ⏎····packName,⏎····packNameId,⏎····providerId⏎·· with packName,·packNameId,·providerId
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack.it-spec.ts
[error] 32-36: Replace ⏎········packName,⏎········packNameId,⏎········orgId⏎······ with packName,·packNameId,·orgId
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/journey/space/space.request.params.ts
[error] 10-10: Replace ·getLicensePlanByName,·getLicensePlans· with ⏎··getLicensePlanByName,⏎··getLicensePlans,⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 43-43: Insert ·
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (31)
graphql/queries/platform/getPlatformLicensePlans.graphql (1)
4-4: LGTM! Verify schema compatibility.
The addition of the id field is logical for supporting license management operations.
Let's verify the field exists in the schema:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since we have sufficient evidence that the id field exists in the licensingFramework type and is being used throughout the codebase. The search results show:
- The
licensingFrameworkfield is part of the Platform type and contains anidfield (seen in multiple generated schema files) - The
idfield is actively used in the codebase (seen in test files and license-related operations) - The field is properly typed and part of the GraphQL schema
The addition of the id field is verified and correctly used.
The field is a valid part of the schema and is actively used in license management operations throughout the codebase, particularly in functions that manage license plans and framework operations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the id field exists in the GraphQL schema for licensingFramework
# Expected: The schema should show the id field as part of licensingFramework type
# Search for licensingFramework type definition in schema files
fd -e graphql -e gql --type f --exec rg -A 10 'type\s+(?:Platform|LicensingFramework)\s*\{'
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find schema definitions
# First, let's locate schema files in common locations
fd "schema|types?" -e graphql -e gql
# Then, let's search for any mention of licensingFramework in GraphQL files
rg -i "licensingframework" --type graphql -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach without file type filtering
# First, find all GraphQL files
fd -e graphql -e gql
# Then search for licensingFramework in all found files
rg -i "licensingframework" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 33339
graphql/mutations/platfrom/deleteInnovationPack.graphql (1)
1-6: Verify error handling for deletion scenarios
The mutation structure looks good, but we should ensure proper error handling for various scenarios:
- Non-existent innovation pack
- Innovation pack that's currently in use
- Insufficient permissions
graphql/queries/account/getAccountMainEntities.graphql (2)
1-2: LGTM! Parameter and root query structure look good.
The query is well-structured with proper typing for the account ID parameter.
1-13: Verify authorization checks in resolvers.
Since this query fetches potentially sensitive account data, we should ensure proper authorization checks are implemented in the resolvers.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the test files examined, I can now generate a final response as we have enough context about the authentication mechanism. The test files show that:
- The query requires a Bearer token authentication
- There's a role-based access control system in place (TestUser enum with various roles)
- The tests verify access using different user roles, with GLOBAL_ADMIN as the default
Authorization checks are implemented at the infrastructure level
The test implementation shows that proper authentication is enforced through Bearer tokens, and the system supports role-based access control. The query requires valid authentication headers, and the test framework validates access using different user roles, indicating that authorization checks are properly implemented at the infrastructure level.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for resolver implementations to verify authorization checks
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements Resolver {
$$$
async $_(account: $_) {
$$$
}
}'
# Search for authorization decorators or checks
rg -l "UseGuards|@Auth|authorize" --type ts
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find resolver implementations and auth checks
# Search for resolver files related to account
fd resolver.*ts
# Look for authorization patterns in TypeScript files containing 'account'
rg -i "guard|auth|permission|access" -g "*account*.ts" -A 3
# Search for the specific account resolver implementation
rg -l "account\(.*ID.*\)" --type ts
# Look for GraphQL decorators and guards
rg "@.*Guard|@.*Auth" --type ts
Length of output: 799
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test file to understand the authentication flow and search for related files
# Check the test file content
cat test/functional-api/account/account.params.request.ts
# Look for GraphQL schema definitions related to account
fd "account.*graphql$"
# Search for authentication middleware or guards in the codebase
rg -l "implements CanActivate|@Injectable.*Guard" --type ts
# Look for authorization-related code in the main application files
rg -l "Bearer|JWT|authenticate" --type ts
Length of output: 4852
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test utils to understand the authentication mechanism
# Check the token helper implementation
cat test/utils/token.helper.ts
# Check the GraphQL wrapper implementation
cat test/utils/graphql.wrapper.ts
# Look for any auth guards in the source directory
fd "guard.*ts$" -t f
# Check the test user enum definition
rg -A 5 "enum TestUser" --type ts
Length of output: 4369
graphql/fragments/license/assignLicensePlanToAccount.graphql (2)
1-5: LGTM! Clear and well-structured mutation parameters.
The mutation parameters are well-named and properly typed with required UUID fields.
1-16: Verify authorization checks for license assignment.
License assignment is a sensitive operation. Let's verify that proper authorization checks are in place.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the test implementation files examined, I can now provide a final response:
Authorization is implemented but restricted to GLOBAL_ADMIN role
The license assignment mutation has authorization checks in place:
- All license-related operations require authentication via Bearer token
- The
assignLicensePlanToAccountfunction defaults toTestUser.GLOBAL_ADMINrole - The implementation uses
graphqlErrorWrapperwhich handles authorization checks - License operations are restricted to users with Global Admin privileges
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for authorization checks in the resolver and related files
# Look for authorization checks in resolvers
echo "Checking resolvers for authorization..."
rg -l "assignLicensePlanToAccount" --type ts
# Look for authorization decorators or guards
echo "Checking for authorization decorators..."
rg -l "@.*(?i)(auth|permission|role|guard)" --type ts
# Look for authorization middleware
echo "Checking for authorization middleware..."
rg -l "(?i)(auth.*middleware|permission.*check)" --type ts
Length of output: 5490
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation details of the license assignment mutation
# First, let's look for the resolver implementation
echo "Checking resolver implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'assignLicensePlanToAccount($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check for any authorization-related code in license-related files
echo "Checking license-related files for authorization..."
rg -l "license" --type ts | xargs rg -l "(?i)(auth|permission|role|guard|check)"
# Look specifically at the test files that contain the mutation to understand the authorization context
echo "Checking test files for authorization context..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "assignLicensePlanToAccount" test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Length of output: 2002
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the license-related test files and implementation more thoroughly
# Check the license params request file for authorization context
echo "Checking license params request implementation..."
cat test/functional-api/license/license.params.request.ts
# Look for authorization checks in entitlements tests
echo "Checking entitlements test implementation..."
cat test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
# Look for any authorization guards or checks in the main implementation
echo "Checking for authorization in main implementation..."
rg -A 10 "class.*License" --type ts
Length of output: 6436
graphql/fragments/license/revokeLicensePlanFromAccount.graphql (1)
1-16: Verify test coverage and integration with assignment mutation.
Let's ensure proper test coverage and integration with the AssignLicensePlanToAccount mutation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the test coverage and integration.
Let me check the functional test implementation to verify the integration.
Let me check the entitlements test file and license test implementation to get a complete picture.
Test coverage and integration are properly implemented
The mutation is well integrated and tested:
- Functional test implementation exists in
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts - Proper integration with assignment mutation is confirmed through the license test implementation
- The mutation is used in conjunction with
AssignLicensePlanToAccountin the test scenarios - Implementation includes proper error handling and authorization checks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for corresponding test files
echo "Checking for test files..."
fd -e ts -e js "RevokeLicensePlanFromAccount" test/
# Check for assignment mutation integration
echo "Checking for assignment mutation..."
rg -l "AssignLicensePlanToAccount" graphql/
Length of output: 300
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for RevokeLicensePlanFromAccount usage in the codebase
echo "Checking for RevokeLicensePlanFromAccount usage..."
rg "RevokeLicensePlanFromAccount" -A 5
# Check if there are any integration or e2e tests that might cover this functionality
echo "Checking for integration/e2e tests..."
fd -e test.ts -e test.js -e spec.ts -e spec.js . test/
Length of output: 9612
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the license test implementation
echo "Checking license test implementation..."
rg -A 10 "RevokeLicensePlanFromAccount" test/functional-api/license/
# Check for any related license test files
echo "Checking for license test files..."
fd "license" test/functional-api/
Length of output: 1227
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the entitlements test implementation
echo "Checking entitlements test implementation..."
cat test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
# Check the complete license test implementation
echo "Checking complete license test implementation..."
cat test/functional-api/license/license.params.request.ts
Length of output: 6281
test/functional-api/account/account.params.request.ts (2)
5-21: LGTM! Clean implementation of the GraphQL test utility.
The implementation follows good practices:
- Proper error handling using
graphqlErrorWrapper - Clean separation of concerns with callback pattern
- Type safety with TypeScript
9-18: Verify the GraphQL query implementation.
The function references GetAccountMainEntities query which should be defined elsewhere.
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL query implementation is properly defined and typed
The GetAccountMainEntities query is correctly implemented:
- Query definition exists in
graphql/queries/account/getAccountMainEntities.graphql - Query is properly typed with generated types in
test/generated/graphql.ts - Implementation matches the usage in the test file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of the GetAccountMainEntities query
# Look for the query definition
rg -t graphql "query GetAccountMainEntities"
# Check if the query is properly typed in generated types
rg -t typescript "GetAccountMainEntities" --glob "generated/*"
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for GraphQL query definition files with common extensions
rg "query GetAccountMainEntities" --type-add 'gql:*.{gql,graphql}' -t gql
# Search for the query in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg "GetAccountMainEntities"
# Look for potential generated files
fd "generated" --type f --exec rg "GetAccountMainEntities" {} \;
Length of output: 1582
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of the GraphQL query
cat graphql/queries/account/getAccountMainEntities.graphql
# Check the generated types to ensure proper typing
head -n 30 test/generated/alkemio-schema.ts | rg -A 5 "GetAccountMainEntities"
Length of output: 336
graphql/queries/entitlements/organizataionEntitlementsQuery.graphql (2)
1-2: LGTM! Query definition follows GraphQL conventions.
The query name and parameter definition are well-structured and follow GraphQL naming conventions.
15-23: Optimize entitlements structure and validate dataType.
- The entitlements structure is duplicated. Consider using a fragment.
- The
dataTypefield might need validation to ensure proper data handling.
+fragment EntitlementFields on Entitlement {
+ type
+ isAvailable
+ enabled
+ limit
+ usage
+ dataType
+}
# ... in query
entitlements {
- type
- isAvailable
- enabled
- limit
- usage
- dataType
+ ...EntitlementFields
}Also applies to: 31-38
graphql/queries/entitlements/myEntitlementsQuery.graphql (1)
27-42: Document the relationship between account and space licenses
The query structure suggests a hierarchical license system between accounts and spaces. To prevent confusion:
- Document how entitlements are inherited or override between account and space levels
- Clarify if space licenses supplement or replace account licenses
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that there is a clear hierarchical license system between accounts and spaces, with evidence from:
- The schema showing distinct license types (
LicenseTypeenum) for Account and Space levels - The ability to assign license plans separately to accounts (
assignLicensePlanToAccount) and spaces (assignLicensePlanToSpace) - Test files showing different license entitlements at account and space levels
Let me verify one more aspect about inheritance rules:
Based on the search results, I can see clear evidence of the license hierarchy and inheritance between accounts and spaces. The schema shows:
- Different license types for Account and Space levels (
LicenseTypeenum) - Distinct license plans for accounts (
ACCOUNT_LICENSE_PLUS) and spaces (SPACE_LICENSE_FREE,SPACE_LICENSE_PLUS, etc.) - Separate mutations for assigning/revoking licenses at both account and space levels
- Test files showing that spaces can have their own licenses independent of account licenses
Let me verify one final aspect about the entitlements:
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the license hierarchy. The schema shows:
-
Distinct entitlement types for accounts and spaces:
- Account-level:
ACCOUNT_SPACE_FREE,ACCOUNT_SPACE_PLUS, etc. - Space-level:
SPACE_FREE,SPACE_FLAG_SAVE_AS_TEMPLATE, etc.
- Account-level:
-
Each level has its own independent entitlements:
- Accounts have entitlements for managing spaces and features
- Spaces have their own feature-specific entitlements
-
The entitlement structure shows spaces have their own license object with:
- Independent authorization rules
- Separate entitlements tracking
- Own usage limits
Spaces have independent licensing from accounts
The license structure is hierarchical but not inheritance-based - spaces have their own independent licenses and entitlements that can be managed separately from the account level. Account licenses control space creation and global features, while space licenses control space-specific features.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing documentation about license hierarchy
fd -e md -e txt . | xargs rg -i "license.*(hierarchy|inheritance|space)"
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for license-related documentation and GraphQL schema
echo "=== Searching for license documentation ==="
rg -i "license|entitlement" -g "*.md" -g "*.txt"
echo -e "\n=== Checking GraphQL schema for license types ==="
fd schema.graphql | xargs rg -A 5 "type.*License"
echo -e "\n=== Looking for comments about license relationships ==="
rg -i "license" -g "*.graphql" -g "*.ts" -g "*.js" --context 3
Length of output: 131426
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for license inheritance logic in source files
echo "=== Checking for license inheritance logic ==="
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.js" "extends.*License|inherit.*license|parent.*license" -C 3
echo -e "\n=== Checking for license policy documentation ==="
fd -e md -e txt . | xargs rg -i "space.*(license|entitlement)"
Length of output: 131487
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for license-related comments and documentation in a more focused way
echo "=== Checking GraphQL schema for license relationships ==="
rg -g "*.graphql" -A 3 -B 3 "type.*License|enum.*License"
echo -e "\n=== Looking for license-related comments in test files ==="
rg -g "*.spec.ts" -g "*.test.ts" -A 3 -B 3 "license.*account|license.*space"
echo -e "\n=== Checking for license-related constants and types ==="
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.js" "const.*License|interface.*License|type.*License" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 65435
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for entitlement types and inheritance rules
echo "=== Checking for entitlement types ==="
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.graphql" "enum.*LicenseEntitlementType|type.*LicenseEntitlement" -A 10
echo -e "\n=== Looking for entitlement inheritance logic ==="
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.graphql" "entitlements.*space|entitlements.*account" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 11982
test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-request.params.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-organized and directly support the file's functionality.
5-18: Consider using a less privileged default role.
Setting GLOBAL_ADMIN as the default role might be too permissive for testing. Consider using a more restricted role by default to catch potential permission issues early.
Let's verify the MyEntitlementsQuery structure and required permissions:
test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation_pack.request.params.ts (1)
Line range hint 5-27: LGTM! Verify rename impact across codebase.
The implementation is well-structured with proper type safety, authorization, and error handling. The rename to createInnovationPack makes the function name more concise.
Let's verify that all references to the old function name have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Function rename is safe and all references are updated
The search results confirm that all references to the function are using the new name createInnovationPack. The function is being used consistently across test files, and there are no remaining references to the old name createInnovationPackOnLibrary. The rename appears to have been properly implemented across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old function name
# Expect: No results, indicating all references have been updated
rg "createInnovationPackOnLibrary" --type ts
Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the rename impact by:
# 1. Finding all test files that might use this function
# 2. Looking for any references to innovation pack creation in test files
# Find all test files related to innovation packs
fd "innovation.*\.test\.ts$"
# Search for any function calls or imports related to innovation pack creation
rg "createInnovation.*Pack" --type ts -A 2
Length of output: 8599
test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack-with-templates.ts (1)
3-3: Verify the function rename impact across test files
The import change from createInnovationPackOnLibrary to createInnovationPack needs to be verified across other test files.
✅ Verification successful
Function rename is consistent across the codebase
The search results show that createInnovationPackOnLibrary has no remaining references in the codebase, and all usages consistently use createInnovationPack. The import change is properly aligned with the implementation and usage across all test files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old function name
# and verify all imports of the new function name
# Check for any remaining references to old function
rg "createInnovationPackOnLibrary"
# Verify all imports of the new function
rg "createInnovationPack" --type ts
Length of output: 3439
test/functional-api/innovation-pack/innovation-pack.it-spec.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly
The import statement has been properly updated to reflect the renamed function.
test/functional-api/license/license.params.request.ts (1)
22-23: LGTM! Improved readability with better formatting.
test/utils/mutations/authorization-platform-mutation.ts (2)
Line range hint 7-186: Implementation follows best practices!
The implementation demonstrates several positive aspects:
- Consistent error handling through
graphqlErrorWrapper - Proper authorization checks with default admin role
- Clear and descriptive function names
- Type-safe role management using
PlatformRoleenum
5-5: Verify PlatformRole enum compatibility after import source change.
The import source has been changed from the generated schema to the client library. While this change aligns with using official client libraries, we should ensure that the PlatformRole enum values remain compatible.
Consider documenting this architectural decision to use the client library instead of generated types, as it may affect other parts of the test suite that still use generated types.
✅ Verification successful
Import change from generated schema to client library is safe
The verification shows that the PlatformRole enum has identical values in both the generated schema and the client library:
- BetaTester
- CommunityReader
- GlobalAdmin
- LicenseManager
- SpacesReader
- Support
- VcCampaign
The change maintains full compatibility, ensuring no runtime issues will occur.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare PlatformRole enum values between the old and new sources
# to ensure compatibility and prevent potential runtime issues.
# Search for PlatformRole enum definition in both locations
echo "=== Client Library PlatformRole ==="
rg -A 10 "enum PlatformRole"
echo "=== Generated Schema PlatformRole ==="
fd -g "alkemio-schema.ts" --exec rg -A 10 "enum PlatformRole" {}
Length of output: 1749
package.json (2)
14-14: LGTM: TypeScript watch mode script added correctly.
The new ts:watch script follows best practices by using the --noEmit flag for development-time type checking.
48-48: Verify the entitlements test configuration exists.
The new test script references jest.config.entitlements.js. Let's verify this configuration file is included in the PR.
✅ Verification successful
Configuration file exists and is properly configured
The entitlements test configuration exists at test/config/jest.config.entitlements.js and is properly set up:
- Extends the base Jest configuration
- Correctly targets entitlements test files with pattern
/test/functional-api/entitlements/.*\.it-spec\.ts - Multiple entitlements test files are present in the codebase that match this pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the entitlements test configuration exists
# Expected: Should find the config file in test/config directory
fd -t f "jest.config.entitlements.js" test/config/
# Also check if there are any test files that might use this configuration
rg -l "entitlements" test/ -g "*.test.ts"
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content of the config file and check for any test files
cat test/config/jest.config.entitlements.js
# Also search for any test files with .ts or .js extension that might use this configuration
rg -l "entitlements" test/ -g "*.{ts,js}"
Length of output: 945
test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements-data.ts (1)
64-139: Verify entitlement limits and usage tracking.
The organizationAccountLicensePlus constant has all usage values set to 0, which might not cover all test scenarios. Consider:
- Adding test cases with non-zero usage values
- Verifying if the limits (3 for most entitlements, 1 for innovation hub) align with actual business rules
Let's verify the entitlement limits across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The entitlement limits in the test data are verified and correct
The test files confirm that the entitlement limits in organizationAccountLicensePlus are accurate and properly tested:
- Space limit of 3 is verified through test cases that create exactly 3 spaces and verify the fourth fails
- Virtual Contributor limit of 3 is tested with similar boundary conditions
- Innovation Pack limit of 3 is confirmed with explicit error messages when exceeded
- Innovation Hub limit of 1 is part of the available entitlements
The usage tracking is properly implemented through the test lifecycle:
- Tests verify both creation and deletion impact on usage counts
- Error messages correctly reflect when limits are reached
- Tests confirm that deleting resources frees up the usage quota
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any hardcoded entitlement limits in the codebase
rg -A 2 "ACCOUNT_LICENSE_PLUS.*limit|ACCOUNT_.*_LIMIT"
# Search for usage tracking implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_($$_) {
$$$
usage
$$$
}'
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for entitlement-related configurations and tests
rg -i "entitlement.*limit|license.*limit" -A 2
# Search for usage tracking in a different way
rg "usage.*dataType" -A 2
# Look for any test files related to entitlements
fd "entitlement.*test|license.*test" --type f
# Search for business rules or configuration files
fd "config|constant" --type f | rg -i "entitlement|license"
Length of output: 3193
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test files to understand the usage tracking and limits implementation
cat test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
cat test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
cat test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
# Let's also check the jest config for entitlements
cat test/config/jest.config.entitlements.js
Length of output: 13214
test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-data.ts (2)
1-62: LGTM! Well-structured baseline test data
The accountNoLicenses constant correctly represents an account without any active licenses, with all entitlements properly disabled and zeroed out.
64-139: Verify alignment between availableEntitlements and enabled entitlements
There's a potential inconsistency in the data:
availableEntitlementsarray lists 4 types- In the
entitlementsarray, 6 types are defined with some marked as available
Consider aligning these lists to ensure test data accuracy.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the schema definitions to better understand the entitlement types.
Let me try a different approach to understand the entitlement types structure.
Let me check the test files to understand the expected behavior of entitlements.
Based on the test files and the original code, I can now provide a final response:
The entitlements configuration is correct and intentional
The apparent discrepancy between availableEntitlements and entitlements arrays is actually by design:
availableEntitlementslists only the currently active/grantable entitlements (4 types)- The
entitlementsarray contains all possible entitlement types (6 types) with their status, including disabled ones (ACCOUNT_SPACE_PREMIUMandACCOUNT_SPACE_PLUSwithisAvailable: false)
This is verified by the test file which shows the expected behavior where:
- All entitlement types are tracked in the system
- Only a subset is marked as available based on the license type
- The test assertions validate this exact behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare available vs enabled entitlements in the codebase
# Search for entitlement type definitions and usage patterns
rg "ACCOUNT_[A-Z_]+" --type ts
Length of output: 9616
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the schema definitions for entitlement types
ast-grep --pattern 'enum AccountEntitlementType {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for entitlement type definitions in schema files
rg -A 10 "AccountEntitlementType" --type ts
# Also look for any documentation or type definitions related to entitlements
rg "type.*Entitlement" --type ts
Length of output: 1852
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for test assertions related to entitlements to understand expected behavior
rg -B 2 -A 2 "expect.*entitlements" --type ts
# Also check the test file containing our data structure
cat test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Length of output: 6215
test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts (1)
187-191: Remove duplicate assertions.
The same assertion is repeated twice unnecessarily.
test/functional-api/journey/space/space.request.params.ts (2)
Line range hint 155-172: LGTM! Consider adding test cases for different user roles
The addition of the userRole parameter with a default value of GLOBAL_ADMIN improves consistency with other functions and enables testing different authorization scenarios. Consider adding test cases that:
- Verify space deletion with different user roles
- Confirm proper error handling for unauthorized roles
Let's check existing test coverage:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Test coverage exists for different user roles with deleteSpace
The codebase shows comprehensive test coverage for the deleteSpace function across different user roles and scenarios:
-
Authorization tests verify deletion with:
- GLOBAL_ADMIN (default role)
- HUB_ADMIN
- GLOBAL_COMMUNITY_ADMIN
- NON_HUB_MEMBER
- HUB_MEMBER
-
Integration tests cover:
- Deletion of spaces in public/private contexts
- Cleanup scenarios with related entities
- Error handling for unauthorized roles
The existing test suite already covers the suggested test cases for different user roles and authorization scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files that use deleteSpace
rg "deleteSpace\(" --type ts --glob "test/**/*test*.ts" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for deleteSpace usage
rg "deleteSpace" --type ts -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 128443
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files containing "space" and "delete" to catch potential variations
rg "delete.*space|space.*delete" --type ts --glob "test/**/*" -i -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 131149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the actual test files in the space directory
fd "test.*\.ts$" test/functional-api/journey/space
Length of output: 52
10-10: Verify the timeline for license plan integration
The commented code suggests an upcoming feature for license plan integration with space creation. Consider:
- Documenting the planned implementation in a ticket/issue
- Adding a TODO comment with the relevant ticket number
- Ensuring test coverage is planned for when this feature is implemented
Let's check if there are any related tickets or documentation:
Also applies to: 23-29, 43-43
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 10-10: Replace ·getLicensePlanByName,·getLicensePlans· with ⏎··getLicensePlanByName,⏎··getLicensePlans,⏎
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/journey/space/space-platform-settings.it-spec.ts (3)
Line range hint 1-42: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.
The import organization and test data setup follow good practices:
- Direct imports from test utilities
- Unique ID generation to prevent test data collisions
- Clear naming conventions for test entities
Line range hint 44-186: LGTM! Well-organized test structure with comprehensive role coverage.
The test suites demonstrate good practices:
- Proper test isolation with beforeAll/afterAll hooks
- Data-driven tests for thorough role-based access verification
- Clear test descriptions and assertions
Line range hint 188-307: Clarify the status of skipped tests.
The file contains two skipped test suites with TODO comments to remove them. However:
- If these tests for archived spaces are valuable, consider fixing them instead of removing
- If they're no longer needed, they should be removed in this PR
- If they need to be preserved for future reference, add a detailed TODO comment explaining why
This will help prevent accumulation of test debt.
Would you like help with either:
- Fixing these tests to make them active
- Removing them if they're no longer needed
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about these tests to understand if they are duplicates or if there are related active tests.
Let me check if there are any active tests that cover the same functionality as these skipped tests.
Remove skipped test suites as they are redundant
The skipped test suites can be safely removed because:
- The functionality is already covered by active tests in the same file
- There's an active test for users WITH access (GLOBAL_ADMIN, GLOBAL_HUBS_ADMIN, GLOBAL_COMMUNITY_ADMIN)
- There's an active test for users WITHOUT access (HUB_ADMIN, HUB_MEMBER, NON_HUB_MEMBER)
- The TODO comments explicitly indicate these skipped tests should be removed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are other skipped tests in the codebase that might be related
rg "describe\.skip.*?DDT role.*?archived Space" -A 5
Length of output: 1302
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar non-skipped tests about archived spaces
rg "role.*?(WITH|WITHOUT).*?access to.*?archived Space" -B 2 -A 5
# Check for any comments explaining why these tests are skipped
rg "ToDo.*remove.*skipped.*test" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2648
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for active tests in the same file that might be covering the same functionality
rg "'User role:.*?have (NO )?access to public archived Space'" -B 10 test/functional-api/journey/space/space-platform-settings.it-spec.ts
Length of output: 1730
test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-request.params.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements-data.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts (3)
45-45: Useconstinstead ofletforspaceNameThe variable
spaceNameis never reassigned after its initial declaration, so it should be declared withconstinstead ofletto indicate its immutability.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-let spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; +const spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 45-45: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
147-147: Rename variableato a more descriptive name or remove itThe variable
adoes not convey meaningful information about its purpose. If the result ofdeleteSpaceis not used, consider removing the assignment. If it is used, rename it to a descriptive name to enhance code readability.Apply this diff to improve code clarity:
-const a = await deleteSpace(spaceId0, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN); +await deleteSpace(spaceId0, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN);Or, if the result is necessary:
-const a = await deleteSpace(spaceId0, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN); +const deleteResult = await deleteSpace(spaceId0, TestUser.GLOBAL_ADMIN);
112-133: Refactor tests to be independentThe test
'Create a space over the license limit'depends on the outcome of the previous tests, as indicated by the comment// Test is dependant on the above test. This can lead to brittle tests and makes debugging more challenging. Consider refactoring the tests to be independent by setting up the required state within each test.test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts (2)
45-63: Add type safety and error handling to test setupWhile the setup is functional, it could benefit from improved type safety and error handling.
Consider these improvements:
- Define privileges as type-safe constants:
const AccountPrivileges = { SPACE_FREE: 'ACCOUNT_SPACE_FREE', INNOVATION_HUB: 'ACCOUNT_INNOVATION_HUB', VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR: 'ACCOUNT_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTOR', INNOVATION_PACK: 'ACCOUNT_INNOVATION_PACK', } as const;
- Add error handling in beforeAll:
beforeAll(async () => { + try { await assignPlatformRoleToUser( users.nonSpaceMember.id, PlatformRole.VcCampaign ); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to assign platform role:', error); + throw error; + } });
82-108: Enhance test coverage with additional assertionsWhile the parameterized tests verify entitlements, they could benefit from additional validations.
Consider these improvements:
test.each` packName | availableEntitlements | error ${`pack1-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} ${`pack2-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} ${`pack3-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} + // Add edge cases + ${`pack-special-chars-!@#`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} + ${`very-long-pack-name-that-is-exactly-at-the-limit`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} `( 'User: VC campaign has license $availableEntitlements to creates an innovation pack with name: $packName', async ({ packName, availableEntitlements, error }) => { // Arrange const response = await getMyEntitlementsQuery(TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER); // Act const createPack = await createInnovationPack( packName, packName, users.nonSpaceMember.accountId, TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER ); packId = createPack?.data?.createInnovationPack?.id ?? ''; // Assert + // Verify pack creation success + expect(createPack?.data?.createInnovationPack).toBeTruthy(); + expect(packId).toBeTruthy(); + + // Verify pack properties + expect(createPack?.data?.createInnovationPack).toMatchObject({ + name: packName, + id: expect.any(String), + }); + expect( response?.data?.me.user?.account?.license?.availableEntitlements?.sort() ).toEqual(availableEntitlements); expect(createPack?.error?.errors?.[0].message).toEqual(error); } );test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts (4)
2-22: Enhance JSDoc documentation with additional tags.The documentation is comprehensive but could be improved with additional JSDoc tags for better organization and cross-referencing.
Consider adding:
/** + * @group Entitlements + * @category Functional Tests * Functional tests for Virtual Contributor (VC) creation and entitlements. * * This test suite verifies the following scenarios: * ... + * @see Related files: + * - entitlements-request.params.ts + * - vc.request.params.ts */
41-46: Consider using a more reliable unique ID generation method.Using
Math.random()for generating unique IDs could potentially lead to flaky tests due to collisions. Consider using a more robust approach.-const uniqueId = Math.random() - .toString(12) - .slice(-6); +const uniqueId = `${Date.now()}-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(-6)}`;Alternatively, consider using a UUID library like
uuidfor guaranteed uniqueness:import { v4 as uuidv4 } from 'uuid'; const uniqueId = uuidv4().slice(0, 6);
90-125: Enhance test robustness and readability.The parameterized tests could benefit from additional validations and improved readability.
Consider these improvements:
test.each` vcName | availableEntitlements | error ${`vc1-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} ${`vc2-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} ${`vc3-${uniqueId}`} | ${allPrivileges} | ${undefined} -`( - 'User: VC campaign has license $availableEntitlements to creates a vc with name: $vcName', +`('should successfully create VC "$vcName" with entitlements: $availableEntitlements', async ({ vcName, availableEntitlements, error }) => { + jest.setTimeout(30000); // Configure timeout for long-running operations + // Arrange const response = await getMyEntitlementsQuery(TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER); const createSpace = await createSpaceBasicData( vcName, vcName, users.nonSpaceMember.accountId, TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER ); const spaceId = createSpace.data?.createSpace.id ?? ''; + expect(spaceId).toBeTruthy(); // Act const createVc = await createVirtualContributorOnAccount( vcName, users.nonSpaceMember.accountId, spaceId, TestUser.NON_HUB_MEMBER ); vcId = createVc?.data?.createVirtualContributor?.id ?? ''; + expect(vcId).toBeTruthy(); // Assert expect( response?.data?.me.user?.account?.license?.availableEntitlements?.sort() ).toEqual(availableEntitlements); expect(createVc?.error?.errors?.[0].message).toEqual(error); + + // Verify VC was created with correct properties + const vcDetails = await getVirtualContributorDetails(vcId); + expect(vcDetails.name).toBe(vcName); + expect(vcDetails.spaceId).toBe(spaceId); } );
48-49: Improve test organization with nested describe blocks.Consider organizing the test cases into more descriptive nested describe blocks for better readability and maintenance.
describe('Functional tests - VC', () => { - describe('VC Campaign user vc creation', () => { + describe('Virtual Contributor Campaign Management', () => { + describe('License Entitlements', () => { + // Test cases for successful VC creation with entitlements + }); + + describe('License Limits', () => { + // Test cases for license limit scenarios + }); + + describe('Error Scenarios', () => { + // Test cases for various error conditions + });test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements.it-spec.ts (2)
53-53: Use 'const' instead of 'let' for 'spaceName'Since
spaceNameis never reassigned, declare it withconstinstead ofletto adhere to best practices.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-let spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; +const spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 53-53: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
216-216: Typographical error in 'BetaTested Licenses cleanup'The description
'BetaTested Licenses cleanup'should be corrected to'Beta Tester Licenses cleanup'for clarity and consistency.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-describe('BetaTested Licenses cleanup', () => { +describe('Beta Tester Licenses cleanup', () => {test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts (1)
38-38: Use 'const' instead of 'let' for 'spaceName'Since
spaceNameis never reassigned, declare it withconstto follow best practices.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-let spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; +const spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 38-38: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements.it-spec.ts (3)
1-2: Remove unnecessary blank lines at the start of the fileThere are extra blank lines at the beginning of the file. To comply with style guidelines, please remove them.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- - /**🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 1-2: Delete
⏎(prettier/prettier)
68-68: Use 'const' instead of 'let' for 'spaceName'Since
spaceNameis never reassigned, declare it withconstto adhere to best practices.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-let spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`; +const spaceName = `space-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 68-68: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
69-69: Use 'const' instead of 'let' for 'orgName'The variable
orgNameis never reassigned and should be declared withconst.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-let orgName = `org-name-${uniqueId}`; +const orgName = `org-name-${uniqueId}`;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 69-69: 'orgName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-data.ts (1)
411-411: Add a newline at the end of the fileFor consistency and to comply with coding standards, please add a newline at the end of the file.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
}; +🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 411-411: Insert
⏎(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
test/config/jest.config.nightly.js(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-data.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-request.params.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-request.params.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
[error] 1-2: Delete ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/space-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
[error] 45-45: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
[error] 38-38: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 39-39: 'licensePlanIdAccountPlus' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/user-entitlements.it-spec.ts
[error] 53-53: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/organization-entitlements.it-spec.ts
[error] 1-2: Delete ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 68-68: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
[error] 69-69: 'orgName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
test/functional-api/entitlements/entitlements-data.ts
[error] 411-411: Insert ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/config/jest.config.nightly.js (1)
13-13: LGTM! The test pattern follows the established convention.
The addition of the entitlements test pattern is consistent with the existing structure and correctly configured for nightly test runs.
Let's verify the test infrastructure setup:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Test infrastructure is properly set up and configured
The verification confirms:
- Entitlements test directory exists at the correct location
- 6 integration test files are present with the correct
.it-spec.tsnaming pattern - No conflicting patterns found in other Jest configs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the entitlements test directory and files exist
# Check if the entitlements test directory exists
if fd -t d "entitlements$" test/functional-api/; then
echo "✓ Entitlements test directory exists"
else
echo "✗ Entitlements test directory not found"
fi
# Check for test files matching the pattern
if fd -t f ".+\.it-spec\.ts$" test/functional-api/entitlements/; then
echo "✓ Found entitlements test files"
else
echo "✗ No test files matching pattern found"
fi
# Check for potential conflicts in other Jest configs
rg -l "entitlements.*\.it-spec\.ts" test/config/
Length of output: 789
test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts (1)
1-37: Excellent documentation and well-organized imports!
The comprehensive JSDoc comments provide clear context about the test suite's purpose, structure, and organization. The imports are logically grouped and all necessary dependencies are included.
test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts (1)
57-117: Consider enhancing test robustness.A few suggestions to improve the test:
- Add timeout configuration for async operations to prevent hanging tests
- Add error handling for API calls
- Consider using more specific matchers than
arrayContainingfor precise assertionsExample enhancement:
test('Add License Plus to space', async () => { // Add timeout jest.setTimeout(10000); try { // ... existing arrange code ... // More specific assertion example expect(responseBeforePlus.data?.me.user?.account?.spaces[0].license.entitlements) .toEqual(accountVCCampaignLicenses1SpaceVCPack.spaces[0].license.entitlements); } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Test failed: ${error.message}`); } }, 15000); // Test-specific timeouttest/functional-api/contributor-management/virtual-contributor/vc.it-spec.ts (2)
59-59: Consider extracting the license plan name to a constant.The magic string 'FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS' should be extracted to a named constant for better maintainability and reusability.
+ const VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS_LICENSE = 'FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS'; - const vcLicensePlan = await getLicensePlanByName('FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS'); + const vcLicensePlan = await getLicensePlanByName(VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS_LICENSE);Additionally, consider adding error handling for cases where the license plan is not found:
- const vcLicensePlan = await getLicensePlanByName('FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS'); + const vcLicensePlan = await getLicensePlanByName('FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS'); + if (!vcLicensePlan?.length) { + throw new Error('Virtual Contributors license plan not found'); + }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 59-59: Replace
'FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS'with⏎····'FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS'⏎··(prettier/prettier)
Line range hint
1-182: Consider expanding test coverage for entitlements API.While the virtual contributor license plan changes are good, this PR's objective is to implement entitlements API tests. Consider adding more comprehensive test cases for:
- Different types of entitlements
- Entitlement validation
- Entitlement assignment and revocation
- Edge cases and error scenarios
Consider organizing these tests in a dedicated
entitlements.it-spec.tsfile to better align with the PR's objectives.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
test/functional-api/contributor-management/virtual-contributor/vc.it-spec.ts(2 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts(1 hunks)test/functional-api/license/license.params.request.ts(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- test/functional-api/license/license.params.request.ts
- test/functional-api/entitlements/innovation-packs-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
- test/functional-api/entitlements/vc-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
test/functional-api/contributor-management/virtual-contributor/vc.it-spec.ts
[error] 59-59: Replace 'FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS' with ⏎····'FEATURE_VIRTUAL_CONTRIBUTORS'⏎··
(prettier/prettier)
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
[error] 16-16: Replace ·assignPlatformRoleToUser,·removePlatformRoleFromUser· with ⏎··assignPlatformRoleToUser,⏎··removePlatformRoleFromUser,⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 38-38: 'spaceName' is never reassigned. Use 'const' instead.
(prefer-const)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts (2)
1-33: Well-structured documentation and imports!
The file is well-documented with clear JSDoc comments explaining its purpose and test scenarios. The imports are logically organized and all appear to be used within the test suite.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 16-16: Replace ·assignPlatformRoleToUser,·removePlatformRoleFromUser· with ⏎··assignPlatformRoleToUser,⏎··removePlatformRoleFromUser,⏎
(prettier/prettier)
40-53: Good test isolation with proper setup and cleanup!
The test lifecycle hooks ensure:
- Proper initialization with platform role assignment
- Complete cleanup of resources after tests
test/functional-api/contributor-management/virtual-contributor/vc.it-spec.ts (2)
27-27: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.
The renamed import reflects a more generic and reusable function name, which is a good practice.
Line range hint 156-182: Address the skipped test and enhance test coverage.
The skipped test for querying virtual contributor data should be addressed:
- Either implement and enable the test
- Or document the reason for skipping in a comment
- Consider adding test cases for:
- License plan validation
- Error scenarios for invalid license plans
- License plan assignment failures
Let's check for other skipped tests in the test suite:
Would you like help implementing these additional test cases?
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/functional-api/entitlements/licenses-functional-entitlements.it-spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Describe the background of your pull request
What does your pull request do? Does it solve a bug (which one?), add a feature?
Additional context
Add any other context
Governance
By submitting this pull request I confirm that:
https://github.com/alkem-io/Coordination/blob/master/LICENSE.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
GetPlatformLicensePlansquery to include an identifier for the licensing framework.Tests
Chores