-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DX: Keyreg bytes #522
Merged
Merged
DX: Keyreg bytes #522
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
27 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
240759e
Merge branch 'release/v1.10.0b1'
algobarb 9d5ec1b
Merge branch 'release/v1.10.0'
onetechnical 23354e9
Merge branch 'release/v1.11.0b1'
onetechnical 51e0364
Merge branch 'release/v1.11.0'
algobarb e6f5aa9
Merge branch 'release/v1.12.0'
algojack 896d2aa
Merge branch 'release/v1.13.0'
onetechnical de80435
Merge branch 'release/v1.13.1'
onetechnical 760d892
Merge branch 'release/v1.14.0'
onetechnical 671aeb6
Merge branch 'release/v1.15.0'
algojack a8508ab
Merge branch 'release/v1.16.0'
algojack 9964004
Merge branch 'release/v1.16.1'
algobarb 7019262
Merge branch 'release/v1.17.0'
algolucky f030f09
Merge branch 'release/v1.18.0'
algobarb 671e136
Merge branch 'release/v1.19.0'
algojack 3b231ac
Merge branch 'release/v1.20.0'
algolucky a411457
Merge branch 'release/v1.20.1'
algojack 9bf39f2
Merge branch 'release/v1.20.2'
algojack e90337d
Merge branch 'release/v2.0.0'
excalq a539d60
Merge branch 'release/v2.1.0'
algobarb b103110
Merge branch 'release/v2.1.1'
algobarb bd5d041
rge branch 'release/v2.1.2'
excalq c7639ca
Merge branch 'release/v2.2.0'
algobarb 894c699
Merge branch 'release/v2.3.0'
Algo-devops-service fc25cc6
Merge branch 'release/v2.4.0'
Algo-devops-service ef2131e
Merge branch 'release/v2.5.0'
Algo-devops-service 84b81ca
Allow the various key-ish fields of a keyreg txn to be bytes
jannotti b508b30
_unbearable
jannotti File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe also add
isinstance(key, str)
otherwiseb64decode
will probably throw an exception (did not check tho)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose it will, but that's life in a dynamic language, I think. Before you could have stuffed something crazy in that field, and you'd get an exception somewhere when we tried to serialize. Now it happens earlier, which I think is better.
But I don't want to try to turn Python into Go and insert type checks all over the place.