Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: better evaluation scripts #116

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

juanjoDiaz
Copy link
Collaborator

I had this for a while sitting on my machine.
A revamp of the evaluation scripts so changes are really simple to evaluate.

We can iterate if you want to do further improvements 🙂

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.62%. Comparing base (ef1c103) to head (fba962f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #116      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.67%   96.62%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines         661      651      -10     
==========================================
- Hits          639      629      -10     
  Misses         22       22              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@juanjoDiaz juanjoDiaz force-pushed the feat/better_evaluation_scripts branch 2 times, most recently from f550b8a to 81f8c98 Compare September 15, 2023 12:38
@juanjoDiaz juanjoDiaz force-pushed the feat/better_evaluation_scripts branch from 81f8c98 to cda01c5 Compare April 2, 2024 19:35
@juanjoDiaz juanjoDiaz mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
@adbar adbar merged commit 6586bcb into adbar:main Apr 3, 2024
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants