Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix for Electron OpenID Authentication #523

Merged
merged 173 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

lelemm
Copy link
Contributor

@lelemm lelemm commented Dec 13, 2024

Since Electron window can't go to another URL. I had to change the way it logins in for OpenID. To make this work, I had to change a validation of the redirect uri

@actual-github-bot actual-github-bot bot changed the title 🐛 Fix for Electron OpenID Authentication [WIP] 🐛 Fix for Electron OpenID Authentication Dec 13, 2024
@lelemm lelemm changed the title [WIP] 🐛 Fix for Electron OpenID Authentication 🐛 Fix for Electron OpenID Authentication Dec 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the isValidRedirectUrl function located in src/accounts/openid.js. The key change is the introduction of an additional condition that permits the function to return true if the redirectUrl.hostname is 'localhost', alongside the existing condition that checks for a match with serverUrl.hostname. This adjustment expands the criteria for what constitutes a valid redirect URL, thereby facilitating local development scenarios. Aside from this modification, there are no significant alterations to the logic, error handling, or control flow within the function. The overall structure and functionality related to OpenID handling remain unchanged, with the primary focus being on increasing the flexibility of URL validation.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

:sparkles: Merged

Suggested reviewers

  • jfdoming
  • MatissJanis

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/accounts/openid.js (1)

307-310: LGTM! Consider adding security documentation.

The change to allow 'localhost' as a valid redirect URL is necessary for Electron's OpenID authentication flow. However, it would be beneficial to document this security exception with a comment explaining why it's necessary and safe in this context.

Add a comment above the condition:

+    // Allow localhost for Electron app's OpenID authentication
     if (
       redirectUrl.hostname === serverUrl.hostname ||
       redirectUrl.hostname === 'localhost'
     ) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 645958b and 9818c33.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • upcoming-release-notes/523.md is excluded by !**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/accounts/openid.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/accounts/openid.js (1)

307-310: Verify security implications and OpenID flows.

While the change is necessary for Electron, let's verify:

  1. That this doesn't affect other OpenID authentication flows
  2. That the security implications are acceptable
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the OpenID implementation and URL validation.


Let me get the complete implementation of the URL validation and the server hostname retrieval to fully understand the security checks.


The URL validation is secure and OpenID flows are properly implemented

The implementation is secure because:

  1. The isValidRedirectUrl function properly validates URLs against the configured OpenID server hostname
  2. It only allows redirects to either the same hostname as the OpenID server or localhost
  3. The OpenID callback flow uses standard security measures:
    • Code verifier for PKCE
    • State parameter validation
    • ID token validation
    • Proper redirect URI configuration

The change to allow localhost redirects is acceptable for Electron apps and doesn't compromise security as:

  • It's a standard practice for desktop applications
  • The validation still ensures redirects can only go to localhost or the authorized server
  • Other OpenID flows remain unaffected as they continue using the server hostname validation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other OpenID redirect URL validations and usage

# Check for other redirect URL validations
echo "Checking for other redirect URL validations..."
rg -l "redirectUrl|redirect.*url|callback.*url" --type js

# Check for OpenID callback handling
echo "Checking OpenID callback handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'client.callback($_, $_, $_)'

# Check for URL security validations
echo "Checking URL security validations..."
rg -i "security|validation|redirect|callback" --type js

Length of output: 2750


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of isValidRedirectUrl and surrounding context
echo "Checking isValidRedirectUrl implementation..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "isValidRedirectUrl" src/accounts/openid.js

# Check OpenID callback route implementation
echo "Checking OpenID callback route..."
rg -B 5 -A 10 "/openid/callback" src/app-openid.js

# Check for URL validation usage in the codebase
echo "Checking URL validation usage..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 "isValidRedirectUrl\(" 

Length of output: 1792


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete URL validation implementation
echo "Getting complete URL validation implementation..."
rg -B 10 -A 15 "export function isValidRedirectUrl" src/accounts/openid.js

# Check server hostname implementation
echo "Checking server hostname implementation..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "getServerHostname" src/accounts/openid.js

# Check OpenID configuration
echo "Checking OpenID configuration..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "redirect_uris|redirect_uri" src/accounts/openid.js

Length of output: 2120

@MikesGlitch MikesGlitch merged commit f80eb88 into actualbudget:master Dec 16, 2024
8 checks passed
@lelemm lelemm deleted the openid branch December 16, 2024 22:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants