-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
change(state): Refactor the structure of verified blocks #7025
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit turns `CheckpointVerifiedBlock` into a wrapper of `SemanticallyVerifiedBlock` since both structs have the same fields.
This commit uses `SemanticallyVerifiedBlock` in `ContextuallyVerifiedBlockWithTrees` instead of `CheckpointVerifiedBlock`.
upbqdn
added
A-rust
Area: Updates to Rust code
P-Medium ⚡
A-state
Area: State / database changes
labels
Jun 20, 2023
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7025 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 77.47% 77.42% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 310 310
Lines 41647 41665 +18
==========================================
- Hits 32268 32259 -9
- Misses 9379 9406 +27 |
This was referenced Jun 21, 2023
oxarbitrage
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work, looks really good.
upbqdn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2023
* Refactor `CheckpointVerifiedBlock` This commit turns `CheckpointVerifiedBlock` into a wrapper of `SemanticallyVerifiedBlock` since both structs have the same fields. * Refactor `ContextuallyVerifiedBlockWithTrees` This commit uses `SemanticallyVerifiedBlock` in `ContextuallyVerifiedBlockWithTrees` instead of `CheckpointVerifiedBlock`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rust
Area: Updates to Rust code
A-state
Area: State / database changes
C-enhancement
Category: This is an improvement
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation & Solution
In preparation for issue #6912, this PR:
SemanticallyVerifiedBlock
asCheckpointVerifiedBlock
instead of having a standaloneCheckpointVerifiedBlock
. This was straightforward due to PR change(state): UseOrderedUtxo
inCheckpointVerifiedBlock
#6971.SemanticallyVerifiedBlock
inContextuallyVerifiedBlockWithTrees
.Reviewer Checklist
Follow-Up Work