Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support build for electron v20 #870

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 21, 2022

Conversation

neoxpert
Copy link
Contributor

@neoxpert neoxpert commented Aug 26, 2022

This PR contains changes in order to support builds against electron 20.

Note: Used MSVC 2022, NodeJS 16.17.0 LTS. Tested builds for electron v16 to v20.

fixes #858
fixes #867

@neoxpert neoxpert requested review from JoshuaWise and a team as code owners August 26, 2022 22:28
package.json Outdated
@@ -24,11 +24,17 @@
"cli-color": "^2.0.2",
"fs-extra": "^10.1.0",
"mocha": "^8.3.2",
"node-gyp": "9.1.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is required? better-sqlite3 never had node-gyp in its dependencies and from the native modules I know this is not common. Can you link to some docs that recommend doing it? I think this will cause more trouble down the line and it's technically not a dependency but part of the build tooling you need (just like Python, make or gcc). If anything it would be a optionalDependencies or peerDependencies.

I'm just trying to improve the chances of getting this merged anytime soon.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The issue here was, that prebuild is still using node-gyp 6.0.1. If you try to build for electron 20, using this old version, the build would fail, stating that node-gyp below version 8.4.1 is not supported anymore. So the explicit use of at least node-gyp 8.4.1 is required.

In addition to that I only had msvc 2022 available on the machine I was testing on, which requires node-gyp > 9.0.0 as otherwise no compiler is found.

Copy link
Contributor

@Prinzhorn Prinzhorn Sep 9, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can extend the node-gyp docs here https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/blob/master/docs/troubleshooting.md . There have been issues in the past where local node-gyp would override the global one. I think that's why it was left to the user (and in the best case you're getting prebuilds and don't even need to worry about it). I'm not pro or against either, I want whats recommended and is the best option for our users.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@neoxpert neoxpert Sep 9, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried using a global installation of node-gyp on a fresh VM. Without overwriting node-gyp, the local version of prebuild still overwrites the global one ending up with building using node-gyp 6.0.1 which is not viable.

Running npx --no-install prebuild -r electron -t 20.0.0 yields:

prebuild\electron\20.0.0\include\node\node.h(27): fatal error C1189: #error:  "It looks like you are building this native module without using the right config.gypi.  Thi
s normally means that you need to update electron-rebuild (>=3.2.8) or node-gyp (>=8.4.0) if you're building modules directly."

I'll remove the dependency, but how to address this issue? No matter which approach I try, to enforce the use of the global installed node-gyp version, prebuild always falls back to its local 6.1.0.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, maybe we need to include node-gyp prebuild/prebuild#286 and the overrides then. I'm not an expert on this, but if it makes the builds more predictable I'm all for it. And I changed my mind on the "it's technically not a dependency", since the build-release script literally needs node-gyp when no prebuild is found. But it should be the absolute minimum like 8.4.0 to be as compatible as possible. Otherwise if a project contains a second dependency that depends on node-gyp we're increasing the chances of conflicts. But someone else should weigh in.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As sqlite3 is using 8.4.1 I would tend to also go with this version for now. But as I am not that deep into this topic yet, I am open for any good advise.

@Prinzhorn
Copy link
Contributor

Prinzhorn commented Sep 9, 2022

@mceachen do you have the necessary permissions to trigger the workflow? I want to see if it succeeds everywhere so that we can move on from there or make changes if necessary. I have a feeling this might fail on older Node.js.

@mceachen
Copy link
Member

mceachen commented Sep 9, 2022

Ugh, node 12:

./src/util/binder.lzz:37:51: error: ‘class v8::Object’ has no member named ‘GetCreationContext’; did you mean ‘CreationContext’?

@JoshuaWise we should drop unsupported versions of Node: v12 EOL was 2022-04-30.

@mceachen mceachen mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2022
@mceachen
Copy link
Member

mceachen commented Sep 9, 2022

So unfortunately GetCreationContext was introduced after Node v14, so we may have to #ifdef around this issue. 😞

@neoxpert
Copy link
Contributor Author

neoxpert commented Sep 9, 2022

Ugh, node 12:

./src/util/binder.lzz:37:51: error: ‘class v8::Object’ has no member named ‘GetCreationContext’; did you mean ‘CreationContext’?

No, the use of GetCreationContext is intentional, as CreationContext is no longer available for v8::Object in the electron 20 header files.

v8-object.h for electron 19.0.0 line 495 and following:

/**
 * Returns the context in which the object was created.
 */
V8_DEPRECATED("Use MaybeLocal<Context> GetCreationContext()")
Local<Context> CreationContext();
MaybeLocal<Context> GetCreationContext();

v8-object.h for electron 20.0.0 line 495 and following:

 /**
  * Returns the context in which the object was created.
  */
  MaybeLocal<Context> GetCreationContext();

Unfortunately this breaks backwards compatibility as the first version to support GetCreationContext was electron 13, at least it's the first version to have it in the header files.

builds for electron 20 fail with prebuild 11.0.4 internal node-gyp version 6.1.0
@quanglam2807
Copy link

quanglam2807 commented Sep 9, 2022

Thank you for the PR. It looks like we also need to use C++ 17 instead of C++ 14 for this to work (ref, Signal's fork: https://github.com/signalapp/better-sqlite3/blob/better-sqlcipher/binding.gyp#L12)

The change failed to compile on my Mac M1 but after switching to C++ 17, it works.

@quanglam2807
Copy link

-      'cflags': ['-std=c++14'],
+      'cflags_cc': ['-std=c++17'],
       'xcode_settings': {
-        'OTHER_CPLUSPLUSFLAGS': ['-std=c++14', '-stdlib=libc++'],
+        'OTHER_CPLUSPLUSFLAGS': ['-std=c++17', '-stdlib=libc++'],
       },

@mceachen
Copy link
Member

mceachen commented Sep 10, 2022

Kudos, @neoxpert , thanks for your work here, and for the assist, @quanglam2807 !

I’ll try this branch locally with PhotoStructure’s test suite, but if anyone else can verify it works that’d be better.

@JoshuaWise do you want to review this before it gets merged?

@@ -24,11 +24,17 @@
"cli-color": "^2.0.2",
"fs-extra": "^10.1.0",
"mocha": "^8.3.2",
"node-gyp": "8.4.1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

^?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although the number of times I've seen non-semver-compliant changes in npm packages is decidedly nonzero. It's safer to pin it, probably.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought this was relevant when another package declares something like ^8.4.3, then they conflict? But maybe I'm wrong about how module resolution works when two packages both require an incompatible version of the same package.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@neoxpert neoxpert Sep 12, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sqlite3 for example already has node-gyp 8.4.1 as dependency, that's why I added and pinned this dependency. We can unpin or even remove it, if a users global installation should be used for better-sqlite3 and add a requirement to use 8.4.1 or higher when using electron v20+. But when it comes down to run prebuild, the overwrite would still be required, as prebuild would always use its internal node-gyp 6.1.0, which is not able to build for electron v20.

mceachen
mceachen previously approved these changes Sep 20, 2022
Copy link
Member

@mceachen mceachen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@neoxpert
Copy link
Contributor Author

As the changes of this merge request are also required to build for the todays release of Electron v21, would we handle this within this merge request / branch or wait until this one is merged and create a new one after that?

@WiseLibs WiseLibs deleted a comment from segmentedcontrol Sep 27, 2022
@Prinzhorn
Copy link
Contributor

@neoxpert could you fork this PR and create a new one with 21 added for the CI? I can't speak for the maintainers, but I just want to make sure that it works (new memory cage should not affects us) so that we're prepared for 21 already. In general I don't see a problem with adding the 21 to this PR, but maybe leave it for now.

@zhoukq
Copy link

zhoukq commented Oct 12, 2022

Hi, just wondering when will we merge this PR?

@JoshuaWise
Copy link
Member

I don't have an M1 mac, but maybe we should incorporate @quanglam2807's feedback before merging?

@mckravchyk
Copy link

I don't have an M1 mac, but maybe we should incorporate @quanglam2807's feedback before merging?

Yes, please. It's not just M1, but also x64 Linux - the commit in the Signal fork that adds this fix is titled: "Fix Linux builds", I can also confirm that I had to apply it before I could build it successfully (on Linux).

@neoxpert
Copy link
Contributor Author

I added the changes mentioned by @quanglam2807.

@maximilize
Copy link

On windows, there are also build issues. This comment saved my day: nodejs/node-gyp#1662 (comment)

@neoxpert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@maximilize Just out of curiosity, which MSVC version are you using? So far I did not encounter any issues with MS Build 2017, 2019 and 2022.

@segmentedcontrol
Copy link

people who can merge, please take another look?

@anonrig
Copy link

anonrig commented Oct 25, 2022

@segmentedcontrol My fork (@anonrig/better-sqlite3) has both arm64 prebuilds and electron 20 & 21 support: http://github.com/anonrig/better-sqlite3

@megancooper
Copy link

megancooper commented Oct 26, 2022

For anyone else waiting on the merge, you should be able to install with:

npm install WiseLibs/better-sqlite3#pull/870/head

Has saved me some time for now 🙌🏽

@ddramone
Copy link

Any plans of merging this in near future? 👀

InCogNiTo124
InCogNiTo124 previously approved these changes Nov 11, 2022
@Juanc1to
Copy link

With yarn, the syntax that worked for me for installing this PR directly is slightly different:

yarn add node-gyp
yarn add better-sqlite3@neoxpert/better-sqlite3#fix_electron20_build

@neoxpert
Copy link
Contributor Author

neoxpert commented Nov 16, 2022

So I also added the /std:c++17 flag for the MSVC settings. But I think it is worth to mention that, as of now, builds against the electron 20 / 21 API only work with MSVC 2019 or 2022. While 2017 should work (whyever it did before I cleaned my MSVC setups...), there seem to be known issues regarding that (electron/electron#36033) leading to build errors (shortened output):

..\v8-callbacks.h(335): error C2062: "int"-Typ unerwartet
..\v8-isolate.h(292): error C3646: "legacy_oom_error_callback": Unbekannter Überschreibungsspezifizierer
..\v8-isolate.h(292): error C4430: Fehlender Typspezifizierer - int wird angenommen. Hinweis: "default-int" wird von C++ nicht unterstützt.
..\v8-isolate.h(1482): error C2061: Syntaxfehler: Bezeichner "LegacyOOMErrorCallback"
..\v8-isolate.h(1545): error C2061: Syntaxfehler: Bezeichner "WasmDynamicTieringEnabledCallback"
..\v8-initialization.h(290): error C2061: Syntaxfehler: Bezeichner "LegacyOOMErrorCallback

@JoshuaWise JoshuaWise merged commit ba9fcec into WiseLibs:master Nov 21, 2022
@JoshuaWise
Copy link
Member

Thanks for all the work on this @neoxpert and everybody 👍

B4nan referenced this pull request in mikro-orm/mikro-orm Nov 28, 2022
[![Mend
Renovate](https://app.renovatebot.com/images/banner.svg)](https://renovatebot.com)

This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [better-sqlite3](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3) |
[`^7.0.0` ->
`^8.0.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/better-sqlite3/7.6.2/8.0.0)
|
[![age](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/age-slim)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![adoption](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/adoption-slim)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![passing](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/compatibility-slim/7.6.2)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![confidence](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/confidence-slim/7.6.2)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
| [better-sqlite3](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3) |
[`7.6.2` ->
`8.0.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/better-sqlite3/7.6.2/8.0.0) |
[![age](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/age-slim)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![adoption](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/adoption-slim)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![passing](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/compatibility-slim/7.6.2)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![confidence](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/npm/better-sqlite3/8.0.0/confidence-slim/7.6.2)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>WiseLibs/better-sqlite3</summary>

###
[`v8.0.0`](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/releases/tag/v8.0.0)

[Compare
Source](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/compare/v7.6.2...v8.0.0)

#### Breaking Changes

-   Dropped support for Node.js versions `10.x` and `12.x`.

#### Non-breaking Changes

-   Upgraded to SQLite version `3.40.0`.
- Fixed LIMIT and OFFSET queries on virtual tables, by
[@&#8203;mandel59](https://togithub.com/mandel59) in
[https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/873](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/873)
-   Fixed various compilation issues:
- By [@&#8203;nathanhammond](https://togithub.com/nathanhammond) in
[https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/894](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/894)
- By [@&#8203;neoxpert](https://togithub.com/neoxpert) in
[https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/870](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/870)

#### New Contributors

- [@&#8203;mandel59](https://togithub.com/mandel59) made their first
contribution in
[https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/873](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/873)
- [@&#8203;nathanhammond](https://togithub.com/nathanhammond) made their
first contribution in
[https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/894](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/894)
- [@&#8203;neoxpert](https://togithub.com/neoxpert) made their first
contribution in
[https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/870](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/870)
- [@&#8203;threema-danilo](https://togithub.com/threema-danilo) made
their first contribution in
[https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/878](https://togithub.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/pull/878)

**Full Changelog**:
WiseLibs/better-sqlite3@v7.6.2...v8.0.0

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At
any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you
are satisfied.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these
updates again.

---

- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Mend
Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View
repository job log
[here](https://app.renovatebot.com/dashboard#github/mikro-orm/mikro-orm).

<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4yOS4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzQuMzcuMCJ9-->

Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@neoxpert neoxpert deleted the fix_electron20_build branch September 10, 2023 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Electron 20 compatibility CreationContext is no longer supported