Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hypothesis #17

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 10, 2016
Merged

Hypothesis #17

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 10, 2016

Conversation

averagehat
Copy link
Contributor

Apparently I broke something as these were passing before, so I'm doing this PR rather than introducing a failing build into the filter-trim branch.

outfile = 'foo'
filter_on_index_quality_interleaved(names[0], names[1], names[2], outfile, _min)
# version using the jip module itself not working
#cmd = sh.Command('jip_modules/interleaved_index_filter.jip')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

uncommenting the sh.Command parts and commenting the filter_on_index_quality_interleaved worked for me, however, it was vastly slower(5 seconds with function call compared to 60 seconds using sh)

I don't know why that is yet

@averagehat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please merge this and I will start working on the latter parts of the pipeline

necrolyte2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2016
@necrolyte2 necrolyte2 merged commit b370f0e into filter-trim Feb 10, 2016
@necrolyte2 necrolyte2 deleted the hypothesis branch February 12, 2016 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants