-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update the set of broken implementations #7928
Conversation
I'm happy to attempt to fix my implementation but it may take me a few days, and so I don't mind if it's marked as "can't run" or whatever in the meantime. |
Sure, there is no rush. As I said, no code is being deleted at the moment, so it won't be necessary to review everything from scratch once a fix becomes available. |
for |
Fair point, but even if the implementation is technically not broken, it is going to waste resources (mainly runtime) in the continuous benchmarking environment. IMHO if the TechEmpower team does not intend to perform an OS upgrade soon, then it still makes sense to disable it. |
It's Ok to disable it sure. Though personally I would like to keep it up as a reminder of tfb lagging on the OS part and not supporting |
You should mention this potential upside to an OS upgrade in #7321 - right now the people there are mostly concerned with the Spectre mitigations and possibly that Ubuntu 18.04 is running out of support soon. P.S. It looks like @dependabot had broken several |
Please don't disable CFML. I have sent a pull which should contain the fix for it here: I don't know how long it's been erroring, but I would have happily updated it right away if I had known. Is there a way to subscribe to notifications when a build fails? If not, that would be a great enhancement! |
No problem, I can remove the CFML implementations from the changes.
Since the end of October, at least.
AFAIK no, you just have to keep an eye on the results dashboard. |
Thanks for the heads up. I think I was pinged for |
About PHP
|
@Lapinskas is the creator of Roadrunner-ubiquity. |
I've just took a glance arg the log - sorry I can't provide support in foreseeable future. the composer install fails as
Set it to 6.* - and the install should complete...
The I've opened the issue on symfony's repo (hope someone will answer the call): symfony/symfony#49447 |
@volyrique regarding |
@volyrique it looks like a simple misconfiguration in settings for Finatra due to some underlying refactorings that happened a bit ago. I can put up a PR to address it. Thanks. |
@nbrady-techempower This PR was closed by mistake, I believe, and I can't reopen it. You can also merge it (as long as it is acceptable, of course) - all the test failures are either the special cases I mentioned in my initial message (and I would appreciate feedback on which of the 3 options I presented would be the best way forward), or I left broken implementations as they were because there were open PRs that fixed them and were passing the tests. |
An updated version of these changes has been merged in PR #7969. |
This pull request updates the set of broken implementations based on the following runs:
adce24e2-9277-45b2-845c-3dbce439d727
05ddf07c-bbc9-4cea-8799-c1103640136c
3d6c6cc0-92ff-4861-86dc-42cef0ecc50f
Note that the code in the repository has not been deleted - it is just not going to run in CI and continuous benchmarking.
As a small courtesy, I am pinging the contributors to the affected implementations, at least in the cases where I could determine a relevant person - apologies to those who have been mentioned by mistake:
@5hirish
@achlipala
@agrison
@bdw429s
@cacoco
@caturner81
@chunariov
@daviddenton
@doubaokun
@dragosv
@fakeshadow
@gi0baro
@gkbrk
@gotzmann
@greenlaw110
@hamiltont
@itsumura-h
@jcheron
@joanhey
@Kaliumhexacyanoferrat
@kekekeks
@kubo39
@lucipacurar
@luoxiaojun1992
@mkurz
@polachok
@richerarc
@seanmonstar
@steveklabnik
@sumeetchhetri
@theLastOfCats
@tiangolo
@tommilligan
@whitfin
There are also plenty of implementations, I think, that consistently have issues with one or a few of the tests, so the question is what we should do about them. The first option is to leave them alone (which is this PR's approach), but we could also mark them as broken - unfortunately that means that perfectly working functionality would be excluded from continuous benchmarking. The middle ground is to remove the affected test entries from the relevant
benchmark_config.json
andconfig.toml
files.P.S. FYI here is the list of implementations that have at least one permutation tagged as broken in the past:
Use the following command to obtain the list:
find -name benchmark_config.json -exec grep -H broken '{}' \; | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | cut -d/ -f3-4