#0000 image responsive issue fixed

[ajinkyapandetekdi]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Adjusted the positioning of the Mechanics component for improved layout consistency on medium-sized screens.

• Chores

  • Cleaned up code formatting and organization for better readability and future refactoring potential.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request involves modifications to the Mechanics2 component located in src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx. The primary change is the adjustment of the left CSS property for a Grid item at the md breakpoint, changing its value from -40px to 0px to enhance layout consistency on medium-sized screens. Additionally, there are several commented-out sections suggesting potential future refactoring, but these do not impact current functionality or behavior.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx	Adjusted left CSS property of Grid item from -40px to 0px for md breakpoint; updated component signature formatting.

Possibly related PRs

• Issueid #228824 Api integration of Fill in the blanks Mechanics #171: This PR modifies the Mechanics2 component in src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the same component.
• Issueid #0000 feat: zoom in and out feature enable for fillintheblanks #196: This PR introduces a zoom feature in the Mechanics2 component in src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx, which is relevant as it also pertains to modifications within the same component.
• Issueid #0000 feat: zoom in and out feature enable for fillintheblanks #199: Similar to Issueid #0000 feat: zoom in and out feature enable for fillintheblanks #196, this PR enhances the Mechanics2 component in src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx by adding an onClick event for zoom functionality, making it directly related to the main PR.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)

src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx (2)

Line range hint 1-1: File name should match the exported component name.

The file is named Mechanics3.jsx but exports a component named Mechanics2. This mismatch could lead to confusion and maintenance issues. Consider either:

1. Renaming the file to Mechanics2.jsx to match the component name, or
2. Renaming the component to Mechanics3 to match the file name

---

Line range hint 401-407: Consider adding width constraints for better image scaling.

While the height is properly constrained using clamp(), the maxWidth: "100%" might allow the image to stretch too wide on larger screens. Consider adding width constraints:

 style={{
   borderRadius: "20px",
   maxWidth: "100%",
+  width: "clamp(200px, 30vw, 400px)",
   height: "clamp(150px, 20vw, 220px)",
 }}

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7206c54 and 3586244.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/components/Practice/Mechanics3.jsx (1)

Line range hint 258-262: LGTM! CSS fix properly addresses the responsive layout issue.

The change from -40px to 0px for the left property at medium and larger breakpoints ensures consistent positioning across screen sizes.