This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 22, 2024. It is now read-only.
Inline execution update into proof of inbound message & Remove execution header storage #125
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yrong
changed the title
vgeddes
reviewed
Mar 14, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good Ron, thanks for the very fast turn-around time. 🙌
One request please - I think is PR is still very much a WIP. In that case, I think its better to open the PR in Draft mode. Otherwise I'm not sure whether to comment on parts of the code, as I don't know if its WIP or not.
yrong
changed the title
claravanstaden
approved these changes
Mar 18, 2024
bridges/snowbridge/pallets/ethereum-client/src/benchmarking/fixtures.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...arachains/integration-tests/emulated/tests/bridges/bridge-hub-rococo/src/tests/snowbridge.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
vgeddes
reviewed
Mar 18, 2024
Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <[email protected]>
claravanstaden
approved these changes
Mar 19, 2024
vgeddes
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to paritytech/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2024
This PR includes the following 2 improvements: ## Ethereum Client Author: @yrong ### Original Upstream PRs - Snowfork#123 - Snowfork#125 ### Description The Ethereum client syncs beacon headers as they are finalized, and imports every execution header. When a message is received, it is verified against the import execution header. This is unnecessary, since the execution header can be sent with the message as proof. The recent Deneb Ethereum upgrade made it easier to locate the relevant beacon header from an execution header, and so this improvement was made possible. This resolves a concern @svyatonik had in our initial Rococo PR: #2522 (comment) ## Inbound Queue Author: @yrong ### Original Upstream PR - Snowfork#118 ### Description When the AH sovereign account (who pays relayer rewards) is depleted, the inbound message will not fail. The relayer just will not receive rewards. Both these changes were done by @yrong, many thanks. ❤️ --------- Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!> Co-authored-by: Ron <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
Ank4n
pushed a commit
to paritytech/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
This PR includes the following 2 improvements: ## Ethereum Client Author: @yrong ### Original Upstream PRs - Snowfork#123 - Snowfork#125 ### Description The Ethereum client syncs beacon headers as they are finalized, and imports every execution header. When a message is received, it is verified against the import execution header. This is unnecessary, since the execution header can be sent with the message as proof. The recent Deneb Ethereum upgrade made it easier to locate the relevant beacon header from an execution header, and so this improvement was made possible. This resolves a concern @svyatonik had in our initial Rococo PR: #2522 (comment) ## Inbound Queue Author: @yrong ### Original Upstream PR - Snowfork#118 ### Description When the AH sovereign account (who pays relayer rewards) is depleted, the inbound message will not fail. The relayer just will not receive rewards. Both these changes were done by @yrong, many thanks. ❤️ --------- Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!> Co-authored-by: Ron <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
dharjeezy
pushed a commit
to dharjeezy/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
This PR includes the following 2 improvements: ## Ethereum Client Author: @yrong ### Original Upstream PRs - Snowfork#123 - Snowfork#125 ### Description The Ethereum client syncs beacon headers as they are finalized, and imports every execution header. When a message is received, it is verified against the import execution header. This is unnecessary, since the execution header can be sent with the message as proof. The recent Deneb Ethereum upgrade made it easier to locate the relevant beacon header from an execution header, and so this improvement was made possible. This resolves a concern @svyatonik had in our initial Rococo PR: paritytech#2522 (comment) ## Inbound Queue Author: @yrong ### Original Upstream PR - Snowfork#118 ### Description When the AH sovereign account (who pays relayer rewards) is depleted, the inbound message will not fail. The relayer just will not receive rewards. Both these changes were done by @yrong, many thanks. ❤️ --------- Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!> Co-authored-by: Ron <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
claravanstaden
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2024
This PR includes the following 2 improvements: Author: @yrong - #123 - #125 The Ethereum client syncs beacon headers as they are finalized, and imports every execution header. When a message is received, it is verified against the import execution header. This is unnecessary, since the execution header can be sent with the message as proof. The recent Deneb Ethereum upgrade made it easier to locate the relevant beacon header from an execution header, and so this improvement was made possible. This resolves a concern @svyatonik had in our initial Rococo PR: paritytech#2522 (comment) Author: @yrong - #118 When the AH sovereign account (who pays relayer rewards) is depleted, the inbound message will not fail. The relayer just will not receive rewards. Both these changes were done by @yrong, many thanks. ❤️ --------- Co-authored-by: claravanstaden <Cats 4 life!> Co-authored-by: Ron <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vincent Geddes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.