Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't count invisible text as possibly wrapped in SIA-R83 #898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2021
Merged

Don't count invisible text as possibly wrapped in SIA-R83 #898

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2021

Conversation

kasperisager
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kasperisager kasperisager added the patch Backwards-compatible change that doesn't touch public API label Aug 23, 2021
@kasperisager kasperisager self-assigned this Aug 23, 2021
@kasperisager kasperisager requested a review from Jym77 as a code owner August 23, 2021 13:52
@kasperisager kasperisager merged commit 709dc77 into main Aug 23, 2021
@kasperisager kasperisager deleted the sia-r83-ignore-invisible-text-nodes branch August 23, 2021 13:52
@kasperisager
Copy link
Contributor Author

kasperisager commented Aug 23, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Merging and releasing a patch right away.

kasperisager added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
@kasperisager
Merge branch 'main' into tuple
5fafcb7 
* main: (21 commits)
  Implement SIA R76 (#910)
  Update CODEOWNERS
  Update `tar`
  Implement SIA-R109 (#901)
  Support `text-align` CSS property (#899)
  Implement SIA-R70 (#870)
  Implement SIA-R60 (#874)
  v0.21.2
  Update changelog
  Don't count invisible text as possibly wrapped in SIA-R83 (#898)
  Avoid test files being included by `yarn pack`
  v0.21.1
  Update changelog
  Reject empty text nodes in SIA-R75 (#896)
  Use separate concurrency groups for workflows
  Use `github.ref` instead of `github.head_ref`
  Limit concurrency of workflows
  Update API reviews
  Exclude `node_modules` in build scripts
  Mark `I` as `Readonly` in `Rule.Evaluate`
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Jym77 Jym77 Awaiting requested review from Jym77

Assignees

@kasperisager kasperisager

Labels
patch Backwards-compatible change that doesn't touch public API
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@kasperisager