Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add pdb to namespaced roles #3694

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2021
Merged

Add pdb to namespaced roles #3694

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2021

Conversation

ukclivecox
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #3692

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

@ukclivecox
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test notebooks

@ukclivecox
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test integration

@ukclivecox ukclivecox requested a review from axsaucedo October 20, 2021 18:31
- scaledobjects/status
verbs:
- get
- patch
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it need patch for status?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Same question for the others)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I guess it's probably the same as what curently in place for the other configuration right? If that is the case then we can merge having both aligned and then remove unnecessary permissions when/if relevant

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah makes sense

@axsaucedo
Copy link
Contributor

/test integration

@axsaucedo
Copy link
Contributor

Seems all v2 server failures (xgboost, mlflow, sklearn)
/test integration

@axsaucedo
Copy link
Contributor

/test notebooks

@axsaucedo
Copy link
Contributor

It seems integration tests failing were different (test label updates) so confirms flakiness
For notebooks tests failed were server examples (which include v2 servers) and explainers - the latter is the only one to validate
/test integration

@axsaucedo
Copy link
Contributor

It seems the explainer examples are failing consistently, but can't really seem how this PR is causing this. Wonder if this is actually happenign in master - will test the notebooks to validate
/test notebooks

@seldondev
Copy link
Collaborator

@cliveseldon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
integration ef96b6a link /test integration
notebooks ef96b6a link /test notebooks

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@axsaucedo
Copy link
Contributor

explainer tests pass so seems mainly flakiness - merging
/approve

@axsaucedo axsaucedo merged commit 86db219 into SeldonIO:master Oct 26, 2021
@seldondev
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: axsaucedo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

stephen37 pushed a commit to stephen37/seldon-core that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants