-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run black (nbQA) on notebooks as part of fmt/lint #3249
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Hi @MarcoGorelli. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a SeldonIO or todo member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. |
d4a1390
to
1cfcaec
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/ok-to-test |
/test notebooks |
It seems the tests get stuck on the |
have reverted - does that notebook pass on master? |
Ok perfecto - thank you @MarcoGorelli, let me re-run |
/test notebooks |
@MarcoGorelli we actually found an issue in our integration tests, which should now be fixed with #3252. Once we merge that we should be able to rebase this branch and re-run the tests. |
Glad this could help uncover an issue - and sure, no hurry, if you ping me once that's in I'll rebase |
Thank you @MarcoGorelli - notebook tests have been fixed, can you rebase? We'll be able to re-run the tests |
87ebff0
to
a661972
Compare
/test notebooks |
Nice one @MarcoGorelli - all notebook tests pass, we should be good to merge |
Happy to help, and do let me know if you run into any issues with nbQA! |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #2885
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: