Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: skip parsing partitioned Postgres tables #105

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 25, 2023

Conversation

billy1624
Copy link
Member

@billy1624 billy1624 commented Apr 14, 2023

PR Info

Bug Fixes

  • skip parsing partitioned Postgres tables

@billy1624 billy1624 self-assigned this Apr 14, 2023
Copy link

@ankit-gautam23 ankit-gautam23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@billy1624 billy1624 marked this pull request as ready for review April 21, 2023 10:48
@billy1624 billy1624 requested a review from tyt2y3 April 21, 2023 10:48
)
.add(
Expr::col((PgClass::Table, PgClass::Relkind))
.is_in(["r", "t", "v", "m", "f", "p"]),
Copy link
Member

@tyt2y3 tyt2y3 Apr 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a comment what these actually mean?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! d615448

@@ -14,3 +16,37 @@ pub enum InformationSchema {
TableConstraints,
ConstraintColumnUsage,
}

pub(crate) fn select_table_and_view() -> SelectStatement {
Copy link
Member

@tyt2y3 tyt2y3 Apr 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this should be named select_XXX_table_and_view
where I highly suspect XXX = inherent?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

select_base_table_and_view 5329fb2

@billy1624 billy1624 merged commit fcd0318 into master Apr 25, 2023
@billy1624 billy1624 deleted the pg-ignore-partioned-tables branch April 25, 2023 06:46
darkmmon added a commit to darkmmon/seaql.github.io that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2023
billy1624 added a commit to SeaQL/seaql.github.io that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2023
* Optional Field SeaQL/sea-orm#1513

* .gitignore SeaQL/sea-orm#1334

* migration table custom name SeaQL/sea-orm#1511

* OR condition relation SeaQL/sea-orm#1433

* DerivePartialModel SeaQL/sea-orm#1597

* space for migration file naming SeaQL/sea-orm#1570

* composite key up to 12 SeaQL/sea-orm#1508

* seaography integration SeaQL/sea-orm#1599

* QuerySelect SimpleExpr SeaQL/sea-orm#1702

* sqlErr SeaQL/sea-orm#1707

* migration check SeaQL/sea-orm#1519

* postgres array SeaQL/sea-orm#1565

* param intoString SeaQL/sea-orm#1439

* **skipped** re-export SeaQL/sea-orm#1661

* ping SeaQL/sea-orm#1627

* on empty do nothing SeaQL/sea-orm#1708

* on conflict do nothing SeaQL/sea-orm#1712

* **skipped** upgrade versions

* active enum fail safe SeaQL/sea-orm#1374

* relation generation check SeaQL/sea-orm#1435

* entity generation bug SeaQL/sea-schema#105

* **skipped** bug fix that does not require edits

* EnumIter change SeaQL/sea-orm#1535

* completed and fixed a previous todo SeaQL/sea-orm#1570

* amended wordings and structures

* Edit

* Remove temp file

---------

Co-authored-by: Billy Chan <[email protected]>
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 Released In 0.12.0 🎉

Thank you everyone for the contribution!
This feature is now available in the latest release. Now is a good time to upgrade!
Your participation is what makes us unique; your adoption is what drives us forward.
You can support SeaQL 🌊 by starring our repos, sharing our libraries and becoming a sponsor ⭐.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Entity generation for partitioned tables
3 participants