Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in doctest configuration #371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

bouweandela
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.92%. Comparing base (fdd2051) to head (d9d0e29).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #371   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.92%   98.92%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        4196     4196           
=======================================
  Hits         4151     4151           
  Misses         45       45           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@trexfeathers trexfeathers merged commit d0e50f7 into SciTools:main Jun 21, 2024
16 checks passed
@bouweandela bouweandela deleted the fix-doctest-typo branch June 21, 2024 14:17
stephenworsley added a commit to stephenworsley/iris-esmf-regrid that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
* main:
  Bump scitools/workflows from 2024.06.0 to 2024.06.5 (SciTools#377)
  Fix typo (SciTools#371)
  Bump scitools/workflows from 2024.04.3 to 2024.06.0 (SciTools#365)
  Update to v0.11.dev0. (SciTools#363)
  Update to v0.10.0 (SciTools#362)
  Extend regridder saving/loading to all regridders (SciTools#357)
  Ensure dtype is preserved after regridding (SciTools#239)
  Move benchmark code from nox to bm_runner (SciTools#361)

# Conflicts:
#	esmf_regrid/schemes.py
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants