Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sparselu benchmark #365

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 14, 2023
Merged

Add sparselu benchmark #365

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 14, 2023

Conversation

j-fu
Copy link
Contributor

@j-fu j-fu commented Aug 14, 2023

So far with direct solvers.

So far with direct solvers.
Copy link

@ai-maintainer ai-maintainer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Add sparselu benchmark

Title and Description 👍

Title and Description
The title of the pull request is clear and concise, effectively communicating the purpose of the changes, which is to add a benchmark for sparse LU factorization. However, the description could be improved to provide more context and explanation about the changes. It would be helpful to include details about the motivation behind adding the benchmark, any specific goals or objectives, and how the changes were tested.

Scope of Changes 👍

Scope of Changes
The changes are narrowly focused on adding a new benchmark for sparse LU factorization. There are no other changes or modifications to existing code or functionality. This is good practice as it keeps the PR focused on a single issue.

Testing ⚠️

Testing
The description does not provide any information about how the changes were tested. It would be beneficial to include details about the testing approach, such as the specific test cases used, the expected results, and any relevant performance metrics or comparisons. This would help reviewers and future users understand how the changes were validated and ensure the reliability of the benchmark.

Documentation ⚠️

Documentation
The following functions do not have docstrings: `lattice`, `fdmatrix`, `run_and_plot`. It is important to add docstrings to these functions to describe their behavior, arguments, and return values. This will improve the readability and maintainability of the code.

Suggested Changes

  • Add a more detailed description to the PR explaining the motivation behind the changes, the specific goals or objectives, and how the changes were tested.
  • Add docstrings to the lattice, fdmatrix, and run_and_plot functions to describe their behavior, arguments, and return values.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer

@j-fu j-fu mentioned this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #365 (8c1c175) into main (3881230) will increase coverage by 1.35%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #365      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   22.00%   23.35%   +1.35%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1386     1387       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          305      324      +19     
+ Misses       1081     1063      -18     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Awesome. I'll accept it here and open the SciMLBenchmarks one.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit f531dd0 into SciML:main Aug 14, 2023
15 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants