CHKO: open questions

[larshp]

A: is the name unique?
Looking at the data format, there can be multiple identical names?

B: name should be string?
Looking at the database definition, the name is a string?

C: translation of parameters missing

D: "modifiable" vs "hidden", the screenshot in https://blogs.sap.com/2021/05/25/how-to-create-your-own-atc-check-in-sap-btp-abap-environment/ says hidden, the format modifiable?

[schneidermic0]

A: Yes the parameter name should be unique. Do you mean the uniqueItems should be set for the parameters array? see also #120

B: It's a char 30 field? See here. What would you expect here?

C: Yes, this is related to #106

D: I agree, we should double check whether hidden would be better

[larshp]

A: if the name is unique, then the technical_id can be removed, not sure if it should. Its part of persistence, but not presented to the developer?

B: looking at the database, its a string?

[schneidermic0]

A+B: OK, I see your point. I'll check it with the team

[albertmink]

Answer for A, B and D in #139

For C it is referred to #106

[larshp]

• Use types close to the database types
• Use terminology as presented to the developer

[schneidermic0]

A: I talked to the developers responsible for CHKO. techincalId is basically obsolet, but an implementation still relies on it. They try to remove the dependency so that we can also remove the techincalId.