Upload kernel image to GitHub #54
Labels
• misc
Related to other topics (e.g. CI).
Comments
|
Trying this out, it seems uploading artifacts is unreliable: it failed for me twice in separate runs. It also makes the jobs fail, so for the moment, let's just avoid it -- we don't need it that much anyway. See e.g. actions/upload-artifact#71 |
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 14, 2022
…_transaction() We are seeing crashes similar to the following trace: [38.969182] WARNING: CPU: 20 PID: 2105 at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2dc/0x340 [btrfs] [38.973556] CPU: 20 PID: 2105 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4 #54 [38.974580] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [38.976539] RIP: 0010:btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2dc/0x340 [btrfs] [38.980336] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd42e03c20 EFLAGS: 00010206 [38.981218] RAX: ffff96cfc4ede800 RBX: ffff96cfc3ce0000 RCX: 000000000002ca14 [38.982560] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 4cfd109a0bcb5d7f RDI: ffff96cfc3ce0360 [38.983619] RBP: ffff96cfc309c000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [38.984678] R10: ffff96cec0000001 R11: ffffe84c80000000 R12: ffff96cfc4ede800 [38.985735] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff96cfc3ce0360 [38.987146] FS: 00007f11c15218c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6dfb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [38.988662] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [38.989398] CR2: 00007ffc922c8e60 CR3: 00000001147a6001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [38.990279] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [38.991219] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [38.992528] Call Trace: [38.992854] <TASK> [38.993148] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0 [btrfs] [38.993941] btrfs_balance+0x78e/0xea0 [btrfs] [38.994801] ? vsnprintf+0x33c/0x520 [38.995368] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x351/0x440 [38.996198] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2b9/0x3a0 [btrfs] [38.997084] btrfs_ioctl+0x11b0/0x2da0 [btrfs] [38.997867] ? mod_objcg_state+0xee/0x340 [38.998552] ? seq_release+0x24/0x30 [38.999184] ? proc_nr_files+0x30/0x30 [38.999654] ? call_rcu+0xc8/0x2f0 [39.000228] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [39.000872] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [39.001973] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [39.002566] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [39.003011] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [39.003735] RIP: 0033:0x7f11c166959b [39.007324] RSP: 002b:00007fff2543e998 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [39.008521] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f11c1521698 RCX: 00007f11c166959b [39.009833] RDX: 00007fff2543ea40 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003 [39.011270] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 00007f11c16f94e0 [39.012581] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff25440df3 [39.014046] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fff2543ea40 R15: 0000000000000001 [39.015040] </TASK> [39.015418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [43.131559] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [43.132234] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2717! [43.133031] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [43.133702] CPU: 1 PID: 1839 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc4 #54 [43.134863] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [43.136426] RIP: 0010:unpin_extent_range+0x37a/0x4f0 [btrfs] [43.139913] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd4216bc70 EFLAGS: 00010246 [43.140629] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96cfc34490f8 RCX: 0000000000000001 [43.141604] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: 0000000051d00000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [43.142645] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff96cfd07dca50 [43.143669] R10: ffff96cfc46e8a00 R11: fffffffffffec000 R12: 0000000041d00000 [43.144657] R13: ffff96cfc3ce0000 R14: ffffb0dd4216bd08 R15: 0000000000000000 [43.145686] FS: 00007f7657dd68c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6df640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [43.146808] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [43.147584] CR2: 00007f7fe81bf5b0 CR3: 00000001093ee004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [43.148589] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [43.149581] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [43.150559] Call Trace: [43.150904] <TASK> [43.151253] btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0x88/0x290 [btrfs] [43.152127] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x74f/0xaa0 [btrfs] [43.152932] ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1e/0x50 [btrfs] [43.153786] btrfs_ioctl+0x1edc/0x2da0 [btrfs] [43.154475] ? __check_object_size+0x150/0x170 [43.155170] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [43.155753] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [43.156437] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [43.157456] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0 [43.157980] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [43.158543] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [43.159231] RIP: 0033:0x7f7657f1e59b [43.161819] RSP: 002b:00007ffda5cd1658 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [43.162702] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f7657f1e59b [43.163526] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000009408 RDI: 0000000000000003 [43.164358] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [43.165208] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [43.166029] R13: 00005621b91c3232 R14: 00005621b91ba580 R15: 00007ffda5cd1800 [43.166863] </TASK> [43.167125] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor pata_acpi ata_piix libata raid6_pq scsi_mod libcrc32c virtio_net virtio_rng net_failover rng_core failover scsi_common [43.169552] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [43.171226] RIP: 0010:unpin_extent_range+0x37a/0x4f0 [btrfs] [43.174767] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd4216bc70 EFLAGS: 00010246 [43.175600] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96cfc34490f8 RCX: 0000000000000001 [43.176468] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: 0000000051d00000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [43.177357] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff96cfd07dca50 [43.178271] R10: ffff96cfc46e8a00 R11: fffffffffffec000 R12: 0000000041d00000 [43.179178] R13: ffff96cfc3ce0000 R14: ffffb0dd4216bd08 R15: 0000000000000000 [43.180071] FS: 00007f7657dd68c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6df800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [43.181073] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [43.181808] CR2: 00007fe09905f010 CR3: 00000001093ee004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [43.182706] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [43.183591] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 We first hit the WARN_ON(rc->block_group->pinned > 0) in btrfs_relocate_block_group() and then the BUG_ON(!cache) in unpin_extent_range(). This tells us that we are exiting relocation and removing the block group with bytes still pinned for that block group. This is supposed to be impossible: the last thing relocate_block_group() does is commit the transaction to get rid of pinned extents. Commit d0c2f4f ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit") introduced an optimization so that commits from fsync don't have to wait for the previous commit to unpin extents. This was only intended to affect fsync, but it inadvertently made it possible for any commit to skip waiting for the previous commit to unpin. This is because if a call to btrfs_commit_transaction() finds that another thread is already committing the transaction, it waits for the other thread to complete the commit and then returns. If that other thread was in fsync, then it completes the commit without completing the previous commit. This makes the following sequence of events possible: Thread 1____________________|Thread 2 (fsync)_____________________|Thread 3 (balance)___________________ btrfs_commit_transaction(N) | | btrfs_run_delayed_refs | | pin extents | | ... | | state = UNBLOCKED |btrfs_sync_file | | btrfs_start_transaction(N + 1) |relocate_block_group | | btrfs_join_transaction(N + 1) | btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1) | ... | trans->state = COMMIT_START | | | btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1) | | wait_for_commit(N + 1, COMPLETED) | wait_for_commit(N, SUPER_COMMITTED)| state = SUPER_COMMITTED | ... | btrfs_finish_extent_commit| | unpin_extent_range() | trans->state = COMPLETED | | | return | | ... | |Thread 1 isn't done, so pinned > 0 | |and we WARN | | | |btrfs_remove_block_group unpin_extent_range() | | Thread 3 removed the | | block group, so we BUG| | There are other sequences involving SUPER_COMMITTED transactions that can cause a similar outcome. We could fix this by making relocation explicitly wait for unpinning, but there may be other cases that need it. Josef mentioned ENOSPC flushing and the free space cache inode as other potential victims. Rather than playing whack-a-mole, this fix is conservative and makes all commits not in fsync wait for all previous transactions, which is what the optimization intended. Fixes: d0c2f4f ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit") CC: [email protected] # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2023
Commit 4fe8158 ("ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus") adds support to allow XDP programs to run on systems with more than 64 CPUs by locking the XDP TX rings and indexing them using cpu % 64 (IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS). Upon trying this out patch on a system with more than 64 cores, the kernel paniced with an array-index-out-of-bounds at the return in ixgbe_determine_xdp_ring in ixgbe.h, which means ixgbe_determine_xdp_q_idx was just returning the cpu instead of cpu % IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS. An example splat: ========================================================================== UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /var/lib/dkms/ixgbe/5.18.6+focal-1/build/src/ixgbe.h:1147:26 index 65 is out of range for type 'ixgbe_ring *[64]' ========================================================================== BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000058 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 65 PID: 408 Comm: ksoftirqd/65 Tainted: G IOE 5.15.0-48-generic #54~20.04.1-Ubuntu Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/0W23H8, BIOS 2.5.4 01/13/2020 RIP: 0010:ixgbe_xmit_xdp_ring+0x1b/0x1c0 [ixgbe] Code: 3b 52 d4 cf e9 42 f2 ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 b9 00 00 00 00 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 48 83 ec 08 <44> 0f b7 47 58 0f b7 47 5a 0f b7 57 54 44 0f b7 76 08 66 41 39 c0 RSP: 0018:ffffbc3fcd88fcb0 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: ffff92a253260980 RBX: ffffbc3fe68b00a0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff928b5f659000 RSI: ffff928b5f659000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffbc3fcd88fce0 R08: ffff92b9dfc20580 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d R11: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff928b2f0fa8c0 R14: ffff928b9be20050 R15: 000000000000003c FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff92b9dfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000058 CR3: 000000011dd6a002 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ixgbe_poll+0x103e/0x1280 [ixgbe] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x12/0xe0 __napi_poll+0x30/0x160 net_rx_action+0x11c/0x270 __do_softirq+0xda/0x2ee run_ksoftirqd+0x2f/0x50 smpboot_thread_fn+0xb7/0x150 ? sort_range+0x30/0x30 kthread+0x127/0x150 ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> I think this is how it happens: Upon loading the first XDP program on a system with more than 64 CPUs, ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is incremented in ixgbe_xdp_setup. However, immediately after this, the rings are reconfigured by ixgbe_setup_tc. ixgbe_setup_tc calls ixgbe_clear_interrupt_scheme which calls ixgbe_free_q_vectors which calls ixgbe_free_q_vector in a loop. ixgbe_free_q_vector decrements ixgbe_xdp_locking_key once per call if it is non-zero. Commenting out the decrement in ixgbe_free_q_vector stopped my system from panicing. I suspect to make the original patch work, I would need to load an XDP program and then replace it in order to get ixgbe_xdp_locking_key back above 0 since ixgbe_setup_tc is only called when transitioning between XDP and non-XDP ring configurations, while ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is incremented every time ixgbe_xdp_setup is called. Also, ixgbe_setup_tc can be called via ethtool --set-channels, so this becomes another path to decrement ixgbe_xdp_locking_key to 0 on systems with more than 64 CPUs. Since ixgbe_xdp_locking_key only protects the XDP_TX path and is tied to the number of CPUs present, there is no reason to disable it upon unloading an XDP program. To avoid confusion, I have moved enabling ixgbe_xdp_locking_key into ixgbe_sw_init, which is part of the probe path. Fixes: 4fe8158 ("ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus") Signed-off-by: John Hickey <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> Tested-by: Chandan Kumar Rout <[email protected]> (A Contingent Worker at Intel) Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 31, 2023
Since we may hold gic_lock in hardirq context, use raw spinlock makes more sense given that it is for low-level interrupt handling routine and the critical section is small. Fixes BUG: [ 0.426106] ============================= [ 0.426257] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 0.426422] 6.3.0-rc7-next-20230421-dirty #54 Not tainted [ 0.426638] ----------------------------- [ 0.426766] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 0.426954] ffffffff8104e7b8 (gic_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: gic_set_type+0x30/08 Fixes: 95150ae ("irqchip: mips-gic: Implement irq_set_type callback") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <[email protected]> Tested-by: Serge Semin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2024
9f74a3d ("ice: Fix VF Reset paths when interface in a failed over aggregate"), the ice driver has acquired the LAG mutex in ice_reset_vf(). The commit placed this lock acquisition just prior to the acquisition of the VF configuration lock. If ice_reset_vf() acquires the configuration lock via the ICE_VF_RESET_LOCK flag, this could deadlock with ice_vc_cfg_qs_msg() because it always acquires the locks in the order of the VF configuration lock and then the LAG mutex. Lockdep reports this violation almost immediately on creating and then removing 2 VF: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.8.0-rc6 #54 Tainted: G W O ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/60:3/6771 is trying to acquire lock: ff40d43e099380a0 (&vf->cfg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] but task is already holding lock: ff40d43ea1961210 (&pf->lag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0xb7/0x4d0 [ice] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&pf->lag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40 lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0 ice_vc_cfg_qs_msg+0x45/0x690 [ice] ice_vc_process_vf_msg+0x4f5/0x870 [ice] __ice_clean_ctrlq+0x2b5/0x600 [ice] ice_service_task+0x2c9/0x480 [ice] process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0 worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0 kthread+0x104/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #0 (&vf->cfg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0xe2/0xc50 validate_chain+0x558/0x800 __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40 lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0 ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ice_process_vflr_event+0x98/0xd0 [ice] ice_service_task+0x1cc/0x480 [ice] process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0 worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0 kthread+0x104/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&pf->lag_mutex); lock(&vf->cfg_lock); lock(&pf->lag_mutex); lock(&vf->cfg_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/60:3/6771: #0: ff40d43e05428b38 ((wq_completion)ice){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0 #1: ff50d06e05197e58 ((work_completion)(&pf->serv_task)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0 #2: ff40d43ea1960e50 (&pf->vfs.table_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_process_vflr_event+0x48/0xd0 [ice] #3: ff40d43ea1961210 (&pf->lag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ice_reset_vf+0xb7/0x4d0 [ice] stack backtrace: CPU: 60 PID: 6771 Comm: kworker/60:3 Tainted: G W O 6.8.0-rc6 #54 Hardware name: Workqueue: ice ice_service_task [ice] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 check_prev_add+0xe2/0xc50 ? save_trace+0x59/0x230 ? add_chain_cache+0x109/0x450 validate_chain+0x558/0x800 __lock_acquire+0x4f8/0xb40 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 lock_acquire+0xd4/0x2d0 ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ? lock_is_held_type+0xc7/0x120 __mutex_lock+0x9b/0xbf0 ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0x50 ? ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ice_reset_vf+0x22f/0x4d0 [ice] ? process_one_work+0x176/0x4d0 ice_process_vflr_event+0x98/0xd0 [ice] ice_service_task+0x1cc/0x480 [ice] process_one_work+0x1e9/0x4d0 worker_thread+0x1e1/0x3d0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x104/0x140 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> To avoid deadlock, we must acquire the LAG mutex only after acquiring the VF configuration lock. Fix the ice_reset_vf() to acquire the LAG mutex only after we either acquire or check that the VF configuration lock is held. Fixes: 9f74a3d ("ice: Fix VF Reset paths when interface in a failed over aggregate") Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dave Ertman <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <[email protected]> Tested-by: Przemek Kitszel <[email protected]> Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We could store the bzImage on GitHub, and just download from there to make testing easier: https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/actions/guides/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: