sys/shell: don't include suit command by default #19294
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
Area: examples
benpicco
added
CI: ready for build
benpicco
added a commit
to ML-PA-Consulting-GmbH/RIOT
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2023
maribu
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2023
|
bors merge |
|
Ah no hurry, we can fit more into the merge train |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2023
19294: sys/shell: don't include suit command by default r=maribu a=benpicco Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <[email protected]>
|
bors merge |
|
Already running a review |
|
bors cancel |
|
bors ping |
|
pong |
|
bors merge |
|
Already running a review |
|
bors cancel |
|
Canceled. |
|
bors merge |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2023
18392: drivers/servo: reimplement with high level interface r=benpicco a=maribu ### Contribution description The previous servo driver didn't provide any benefit over using PWM directly, as users controlled the servo in terms of PWM duty cycles. This changes the interface to provide a high level interface that abstracts the gory PWM details. In addition, a SAUL layer and auto-initialization is provided. ### Testing procedure The test application provides access to the servo driver via the `saul` shell command. ``` > saul 2022-08-02 22:12:31,826 # saul 2022-08-02 22:12:31,827 # ID Class Name 2022-08-02 22:12:31,830 # #0 ACT_SWITCH LD1(green) 2022-08-02 22:12:31,832 # #1 ACT_SWITCH LD2(blue) 2022-08-02 22:12:31,834 # #2 ACT_SWITCH LD3(red) 2022-08-02 22:12:31,837 # #3 SENSE_BTN B1(User button) 2022-08-02 22:12:31,838 # #4 ACT_SERVO servo > saul write 4 0 2022-08-02 22:12:41,443 # saul write 4 0 2022-08-02 22:12:41,445 # Writing to device #4 - servo 2022-08-02 22:12:41,447 # Data: 0 2022-08-02 22:12:41,450 # [servo] setting 0 to 2949 (0 / 255) 2022-08-02 22:12:41,453 # data successfully written to device #4 > saul write 4 256 2022-08-02 22:12:45,343 # saul write 4 256 2022-08-02 22:12:45,346 # Writing to device #4 - servo 2022-08-02 22:12:45,347 # Data: 256 2022-08-02 22:12:45,351 # [servo] setting 0 to 6865 (255 / 255) 2022-08-02 22:12:45,354 # data successfully written to device #4 ``` Each write resulted in the MG90S servo that I connected to move to the corresponding position. ### Issues/PRs references 19292: sys/phydat: Fix unit confusion r=benpicco a=maribu ### Contribution description Previously, `UNIT_G` was used for g-force with the correct symbol `g`, `UNIT_GR` for gram (as in kilogram) with the incorrect symbol `G` (which would be correct for Gauss), and `UNIT_GS` for Gauss with symbol `Gs` (which is an alternative correct symbol). To avoid confusion between G-Force, Gauss, and Gram the units have been renamed to `UNIT_G_FORCE`, `UNIT_GRAM`, and `UNIT_GAUSS`. In addition, gram now uses the correct symbol `g`; which sadly is the same as for g-force. But usually there is enough context to tell them apart. ### Testing procedure Green CI ### Issues/PRs references None 19294: sys/shell: don't include suit command by default r=benpicco a=benpicco 19295: gcoap: Finish the gcoap_get_resource_list_tl -> gcoap_get_resource_list renaming r=benpicco a=chrysn ### Contribution description In #16688, an argument was added to the `gcoap_get_resource_list` function by creating a new function `gcoap_get_resource_list_tl` with a deprecation and roll-over plan. This plan has not been acted on so far. This PR shortens the original plan by just adding the argument to `gcoap_get_resource_list` and removing `gcoap_get_resource_list_tl` in a single go. The rationale for this deviation is that while it's a public API, its only two practical consumers are the (built-in) well-known/core implementation, and the (built-in) CoRE Resource Directory (cord) endpoint. Moreover, a further change to this API (switching over to `coap_block_slicer_t`) is expected to happen within this release cycle, which would take something like 4 total releases to get through otherwise, which is unrealistic for an API that there are no known external users of. A second commit clean up ToDo items (in the changed function's documentation) that referred to a IETF draft that has long been abandoned by the CoRE WG. ### Testing procedure Plain inspection and CI passing should suffice. ### AOB There is a second analogous pair left over from #16688, `gcoap_req_send` / `gcoap_req_send_tl`. As that *is* expected to be used widely, I prefer not to mix these two concerns, and get the present one through without unnecessary hold-up. Co-authored-by: Marian Buschsieweke <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: chrysn <[email protected]>
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
|
Build succeeded: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
The
suitcommand is pretty expensive as it callssuit_worker_trigger()which starts the SUIT worker thread.If this function is not called otherwise, this will pull in the (quite substantial) suit worker thread stack.
Testing procedure
If your application calls
suit_handle_url()directly (doesn't make use of the worker thread) this saves3 * THREAD_STACKSIZE_LARGEBytes of RAM.Issues/PRs references