-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PMID:21933337 Risk assessment studies on succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, the new weapons in the battle to control Septoria leaf blotch in wheat #207
Comments
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
CuzickA
added a commit
to PHI-base/data
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2024
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
CuzickA
added
Nearly ready for approval
and removed
needs PHI phenotype annotation
labels
Jan 29, 2024
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Next steps list
|
CuzickA
added
checked
unapproved until archetype AE checked
needs UniProt id swap
and removed
needs_checking
next
labels
Jan 29, 2024
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Great, thanks @jseager7. |
Session approved without Nichola checking AE alteration in archetype. Closing ticket. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Curated by @jingluodatacurator
https://canto.phi-base.org/curs/fa6dafc2380a5876
Notes:
Uniprot IDs: G4XX47, G4XX53, G8EI90
StrainsGenes/proteins: SdhB, SdhC, SdhD (see Table 3 and Table 4)Strains: IPO323 and IRE30
Main expt. for curation: see in Results 'Identification of Sdh mutations in carboxin-resistant
UV mutants' and 'Relationship between mutant Sdh variants and SDHI
sensitivity', and Table 3, Table 4, Figure 4.
Notes on Uniprot IDs:
basesd on GenBank accession numbers JF916683-916700 were given, G8EI90 was from JF916683 for SdhB, G4XX47 was from JF916689 for SdhD, G4XX53 was from JF916695 for SdhC.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: