Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AD: Support UserProp linearization #612

Closed

Conversation

HaymanConsulting
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is NOT ready to be merged. Test results need to be verified with Nick Johnson and the OpenFAST team.

Development is complete, testing was performed (but not by the developer). No documentation changes needed other than perhaps to mention inclusion of the active aerodynamic control capability in the linearization scheme

Feature or improvement description
The active aerodynamic control capability (UserProp) is now included in the linearization scheme.

Impacted areas of the software

AeroDyn, FAST_Lin, FAST_Subs: Linearization of AeroDyn.

@rafmudaf rafmudaf marked this pull request as draft December 30, 2020 21:06
@rafmudaf rafmudaf changed the title F/ad user prop lin AD: Support UserProp linearization Jan 20, 2021
andrew-platt
andrew-platt previously approved these changes Jan 20, 2021
@andrew-platt andrew-platt self-assigned this Mar 4, 2021
@bjonkman
Copy link
Contributor

bjonkman commented Mar 11, 2021

The code for this pull request seems to have been merged already as part of the TCF PR #537 (with one bug fix later in my UA shutoff PR #647, corresponding to Greg's a4801de commit).

@andrew-platt andrew-platt marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2021 23:58
@andrew-platt andrew-platt changed the base branch from dev to main March 12, 2021 00:00
@andrew-platt andrew-platt changed the base branch from main to dev March 12, 2021 00:00
@andrew-platt
Copy link
Collaborator

andrew-platt commented Mar 12, 2021

@bjonkman, I agree. It looks like this was included in the TCF PR #537, and updated with your later PR #647.

@HaymanConsulting, can you comment on this?

Copy link
Collaborator

@andrew-platt andrew-platt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like this was already merged in. See conversation.

@andrew-platt andrew-platt dismissed their stale review March 12, 2021 00:43

It appears these changes were already merged, and one bug introduced by them was fixed in #647.

@andrew-platt andrew-platt self-requested a review March 12, 2021 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants