Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADI bugfix: BoxExceed was not enabled for OLAF with ADI #2518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

andrew-platt
Copy link
Collaborator

Ready to merge

Feature or improvement description
Neither the C-bindings nor AD driver could use the BoxExceedAllow option with OLAF

Related issue, if one exists
Reported out side of GH

Impacted areas of the software
This will allow AeroDyn driver and ADI library to handle wind with OLAF that exceeds the bounds of the turbulent wind box the same way that OpenFAST does.

Additional supporting information
This issue is also present in 4.0.0

Test results, if applicable
N/A

Neither the C-bindings nor AD driver could use the BoxExceedAllow option with OLAF
Copy link
Contributor

@mayankchetan mayankchetan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@andrew-platt andrew-platt merged commit 9344e3d into OpenFAST:rc-3.5.5 Nov 15, 2024
37 of 38 checks passed
@andrew-platt andrew-platt deleted the b/ADI_BoxExceed branch November 21, 2024 22:12
andrew-platt added a commit to andrew-platt/openfast that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
This was introduced in PR OpenFAST#2518.  The result was that anytime the driver was used with OLAF, all points were allowed outside the box, not just the wake as intended.
andrew-platt added a commit to andrew-platt/openfast that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
This was introduced in PR OpenFAST#2518.  The result was that anytime the driver was used with OLAF, all points were allowed outside the box, not just the wake as intended.
This was referenced Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants