Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests/decode: Verify unknown ethertype event #1954

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jlucovsky
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: 7129

Ticket

If your pull request is related to a Suricata ticket, please provide
the full URL to the ticket here so this pull request can monitor
changes to the ticket status:

Redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7129

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
requires:
min-version: 7
lt-version: 8
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need this ? (deserves a comment maybe)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will add a readme file for this test explaining things.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unresolving until a README is added then

match:
event_type: anomaly
anomaly.type: decode
anomaly.event: decoder.ethernet.unknown_ethertype
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have the unknown ether type logged ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, the unknown value is not logged

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmm... How could we get it ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess pcap logging would be one way to get it...

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is not ether.ether_type: 47099 what we want ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
requires suricata pr Depends on a PR in Suricata
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants