-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests/decode: Verify unknown ethertype event #1954
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | |||
requires: | |||
min-version: 7 | |||
lt-version: 8 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need this ? (deserves a comment maybe)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will add a readme file for this test explaining things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unresolving until a README is added then
match: | ||
event_type: anomaly | ||
anomaly.type: decode | ||
anomaly.event: decoder.ethernet.unknown_ethertype |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we have the unknown ether type logged ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, the unknown value is not logged
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm... How could we get it ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess pcap logging would be one way to get it...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is not ether.ether_type: 47099
what we want ?
Issue: 7129
Issue: 7129
Ticket
If your pull request is related to a Suricata ticket, please provide
the full URL to the ticket here so this pull request can monitor
changes to the ticket status:
Redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7129