-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
llvmPackages_10: 10.0.0 -> 10.0.1 #88248
Conversation
|
I would suggest waiting a little, maybe the tarballs will be added later (I think the source-code archives are auto-generated). Someone already asked for the usual tarballs (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141684.html). |
Well, having such a monorepo-style thing would help tracking |
@ggreif I agree, the mono-repo is the right way (also to track other llvm-repositories like the one from amd). |
Okay, the split tarballs arrived. Updating... |
de415c4
to
530e10f
Compare
@GrahamcOfBorg build llvm_10 clang_10 lldb_10 lld_10 llvmPackages_10 |
The only problem I see is #87528. So this is ready for review. |
LGTM. It builds and I didn't have any problems with small test compilations. Edit: It should be squashed before merging :) |
c17e2fb
to
659aa0c
Compare
Result of 14 packages failed to build:- ameba - crystal (crystal_0_34) - crystal2nix - crystal_0_31 - crystal_0_32 - crystal_0_33 - gitAndTools.thicket - google-cloud-cpp - icr - lucky-cli - mint - oq - scry - shards 15 packages built:- bat-extras.prettybat - chromium - clang-tools - clang_10 - embree2 - ispc - lld_10 - lldb_10 - llvm_10 - luxcorerender - python37Packages.tiledb - python38Packages.tiledb - tiledb - tinygo - zig |
@Mic92 Thanks for doing this! Do you get different results with 10.0.0? (It is okay to say "don't know" then I'll try it locally.)
I bet this is #87528. When will that be out of |
This is the result I get with
on a x86_64 system. |
In doubt I would trust this result more. I don't have a nix-daemon running on this machine, so there might be subtle bugs. |
f376fbb
to
75baa7f
Compare
|
|
@DieGoldeneEnte we still have the manpages problem. Any ideas what they could be? |
See 2a5899b (and parent) for how to revert to candidates. |
This is a purely bugfix release. See: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/release-testers/2020-July/001297.html
FYI I think we can remove (comment out) the llvm manpages for 8 until 10 (and the lldb for 10) since it can't be viewed with What do you think @ggreif @matthewbauer ? |
@DieGoldeneEnte I am okay with that, since you can read the manpages on the internet anyway. Do you want to add a commit? |
I'll open an other PR so I can disable them all in one commit. Edit: #94061 |
Motivation for this change
10.0.1 final is out:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/release-testers/2020-July/001297.html
RCs are out:
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)