-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
treewide: remove vrthra, cpages and lovek323 from meta.maintainers #324539
treewide: remove vrthra, cpages and lovek323 from meta.maintainers #324539
Conversation
@vrthra gentle ping |
Please explain in the commit message why. |
Done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If they ever want to come back, they can always re-add themselves.
P.S.: some packages still refer to them. I am reworking these packages in other PRs, some of them into Staging. |
This removal PR has already been merged, despite not being grounded within community consensus. See #337478 (comment) @vrthra @cpages @lovek323 be sure that we value your involvement and any time you may have to spare, helping with the packages you've maintained and others as well, and if you decide to come back, please don't hesitate to be added to maintainers again. |
Description of changes
Since they are not active anymore.
#310759
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.