-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inconsistent SRI hash requirements? #11996
Comments
As a workaround, one can use e.g. |
Oh, dropping |
This issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2024-12-04-nix-team-meeting-minutes-200/57005/1 |
Describe the bug
In SRI hashes, sometimes the final
=
is required and sometimes it is not.Our nixpkgs have many cases where it's omitted, e.g.
because nix doesn't protest when building these.
But some commands do require it, e.g.
Expected behavior
Right now we can't use the command (easily) to process nixpkgs, etc. So probably allow missing
=
in the command.Add 👍 to issues you find important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: