Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

requestSyncrhoneExtensionEscrow implementation #4

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Gujjar95
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

return {'error' : ValueError('first parameter must be a valid eth address')}
ret : List[Any] = []
#no idea about address parameter
ret.append(self._web3Single.toSolidityBytes32(address, extensionParams[0]))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

address should be a string.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok got it

@@ -6,13 +6,33 @@
from servicesCore.requestCore_service import RequestCoreService
from servicesExternal.web3_single import Web3Single


requestCoreArtifact = Artifacts.requestCoreArtifact
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you don't need to do this, they're already imported on line 4 from artifacts import *

@@ -6,13 +6,33 @@
from servicesCore.requestCore_service import RequestCoreService
from servicesExternal.web3_single import Web3Single


requestCoreArtifact = Artifacts.requestCoreArtifact
requestSynchroneExtensionEscrowArtifact = Artifacts.requestSynchroneExtensionEscrowArtifact
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same for this line as well.

class RequestSynchroneExtensionEscrowService:
def __init__(self):
pass
global requestCoreArtifact, requestSynchroneExtensionEscrowArtifact
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is likely not needed either.

pass
global requestCoreArtifact, requestSynchroneExtensionEscrowArtifact
self._web3Single = Web3Single.getInstance()
self._abiRequestCore = requestCoreArtifact.abi
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The artifacts need to be interacted with like dicts, so you'll need to do requestCoreArtifact['abi']


def parseParameters(self, extensionParams: List[Any]) -> Any:
pass
if not extensionParams or not self._web3Single.isAddressNoChecksum(extensionParams[0]):
return {'error' : ValueError('first parameter must be a valid eth address')}
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's strange to return a dictionary like this. Is this what the calling functions are expecting?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nick, so should we raise an error here or any other?

#no idea about address parameter
ret.append(self._web3Single.toSolidityBytes32("address", extensionParams[0]))
for i in range(1,9):
ret.append(self._web3Single.toSolidityBytes32('bytes32',0))
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This appends the same thing 8 times, is there a reason that it's the same thing every time and is there a reason you're doing range(1,9) instead of range(8)

ret.append(self._web3Single.toSolidityBytes32("address", extensionParams[0]))
for i in range(1,9):
ret.append(self._web3Single.toSolidityBytes32('bytes32',0))
return {'result' : ret}
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again with the strange return style, is that what's expected?

@NickChapman
Copy link
Owner

@Gujjar95 any update on this or would you like me to take care of these changes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants