Refactor dynamic table

[ehennestad]

Motivation

PR #543 (Convert Azure Pipelines to GitHub actions) contained several changes to the dynamic table interface. In order to keep a clear separation of concerns, I wanted to separate all code changes related to dynamic table refactoring into a separate (this) PR.

Checklist

• Have you ensured the PR description clearly describes the problem and solutions?
• Have you checked to ensure that there aren't other open or previously closed Pull Requests for the same change?
• If this PR fixes an issue, is the first line of the PR description fix #XX where XX is the issue number?

[ehennestad]

@lawrence-mbf Would you mind giving a brief overview of the motivation for the changes in this PR?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.83333% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.18%. Comparing base (6717aa1) to head (07b746d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
+types/+util/+dynamictable/addVarargColumn.m	73.17%	22 Missing ⚠️
+types/+util/getVectorClassName.m	60.86%	9 Missing ⚠️
+types/+util/+dynamictable/addColumn.m	94.44%	1 Missing ⚠️
+types/+util/+dynamictable/addRawData.m	92.30%	1 Missing ⚠️
+types/+util/+dynamictable/getIndex.m	97.56%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #612      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.63%   90.18%   -0.46%     
==========================================
  Files         106      107       +1     
  Lines        4689     4767      +78     
==========================================
+ Hits         4250     4299      +49     
- Misses        439      468      +29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.