Revised supply air flow rate fields in multiple IDD objects

[rraustad]

Used "cooling", "heating", or "no load" as initial text in field name and removed lengthy trailing text (e.g., During Cooling Operation, When No Cooling is Needed, No Cooling or Heating is Required, etc.)

Any comments before I update the IORef?

• Revise IDD field names
• Revise IO Reference document
• Compare IDD and IO Ref

[mjwitte]

@rraustad These look good. The field names are much more readable and concise. Affected more places than I had expected. So, one question for clarification, with FractionOfAutosizedCoolingAirflow, the base value that the fraction is applied to is the cooling design flow rate from the sizing calcs, correct? So, let's say the sizing calcs come up with 0.05 m3/s, but the Cooling Supply Air Flow Rate Method = SupplyAirFlowRate and the Cooling Supply Air Flow Rate is specified at 0.04 m3/s. Now if the Heating or No Load method is FractionOfAutosizedCoolingAirflow, will it be based on 0.05 or 0.04?

[rraustad]

@mjwitte Correct on the "autosized" basis. I guess we need a FractionofHardsizedCooling(Heating)AirFlow. This is good though since I did want to include more choices in the sizing choices. I will be starting with the AirloopHVAC:UnitarySystem to continue with sizing consolidations. I'll see what I can do given the tight budget.

[nrel-bot]

@mjwitte @rraustad @lgentile it has been 7 days since this pull request was last updated.

[nrel-bot]

@mjwitte @rraustad @lgentile it has been 7 days since this pull request was last updated.

[nrel-bot]

@mjwitte @rraustad @lgentile it has been 7 days since this pull request was last updated.

[nrel-bot]

@mjwitte @rraustad @lgentile it has been 7 days since this pull request was last updated.

[rraustad]

IO Ref checked into https://github.com/NREL/EnergyPlusBuildSupport/tree/master/docs/src/mods/for_2015_03_release/RR-Update%20IO%20Ref%20Supply%20Air%20Flow%20Rate%20fields%20and%20other%20associated%20text

This is the full IO Ref since many objects were modified. If there is a problem with merging, I guess I am on the hook to revise this document into smaller sections.

Closing pull request.

[rraustad]

This needs to stay open until the IDD is merged into develop.

[nrel-bot]

@mjwitte @rraustad @lgentile it has been 7 days since this pull request was last updated.

[mjwitte]

@rraustad IDD looks good - sorry for the delay in reviewing. Merging. Will review docs next.