/properties endpoint

[alexdunnjpl]

🗒️ Summary

Re-implements /products endpoint.
Implements a helper class PdsProperty, which should gradually replace the associated utility class (and be extended, if validation is determined to be required.

⚙️ Test Data and/or Report

Existing test PDS/registry-api#277 /properties endpoint (testrail C2488844) passes

re-implements #277 #322
closes #506

[tloubrieu-jpl]

Perfect, hanks @alexdunnjpl .

Regarding the test in postman, one test exists already, it just need to be unskipped.
I will do a PR for that.

[tloubrieu-jpl]

However @alexdunnjpl , I am now having an error with the integration test, for example:

 Unable to parse q (product_class EQ "Product_Bundle")error message is org.antlr.v4.runtime.misc.ParseCancellationException
2024-08-22T11:35:36.904-04:00  INFO 78031 --- [nio-8081-exec-6] g.n.p.a.r.m.e.RegistryApiException       : 8a163485-e6c9-4a28-b449-660674ee58b4 UnparsableQParamException: Unable to parse the q parameter:q string value:(product_class EQ "Product_Bundle") Error message null
2024-08-22T11:35:36.904-04:00 DEBUG 78031 --- [nio-8081-exec-6] .m.m.a.ExceptionHandlerExceptionResolver : Using @ExceptionHandler gov.nasa.pds.api.registry.controllers.RegistryApiResponseEntityExceptionHandler#unparsableQParam(UnparsableQParamException, WebRequest)
2024-08-22T11:35:36.904-04:00 DEBUG 78031 --- [nio-8081-exec-6] o.s.w.s.m.m.a.HttpEntityMethodProcessor  : Using 'application/json', given [application/json] and supported [text/plain, */*, application/json]

That might be something wrong on my side, I will investigate that later. I just wanted to give you a heads up.

[tloubrieu-jpl]

@alexdunnjpl , weirdly you don't have the latest version of lexer/src/main/antlr4/gov/nasa/pds/api/registry/lexer/Search.g4 in this branch which causes some tests to fail.
Do you know why ?

[alexdunnjpl]

@alexdunnjpl , weirdly you don't have the latest version of lexer/src/main/antlr4/gov/nasa/pds/api/registry/lexer/Search.g4 in this branch which causes some tests to fail. Do you know why ?

@tloubrieu-jpl that's because (presumably) you're running the tests on this branch rather than the result of merging this branch into develop, and this branch doesn't have the relevant commit(s).

I've rebased on develop, so that should be sorted now.