Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

be able to specify the path to pipenv #978

Closed
brettcannon opened this issue Mar 7, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #3957
Closed

be able to specify the path to pipenv #978

brettcannon opened this issue Mar 7, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #3957
Assignees
Labels
feature-request Request for new features or functionality

Comments

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

As of pypa/pipenv#1474 (in 11.1.2), pipenv added support for -m execution (although there are other issues on Windows currently preventing me from verifying that it works). Once we can verify this works, we can then change our commands to use python -m pipenv and thus work on Windows more easily.

@brettcannon brettcannon added feature-request Request for new features or functionality needs PR and removed feature-extension labels Mar 7, 2018
@techalchemy
Copy link

@brettcannon if we can track the other related issues affecting windows we can try to fast-track those fixes (I am using windows primarily as well) -- just tag me and I can triage

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member Author

@techalchemy pypa/pipenv#1587 is the latest issue I have bumped up against on Windows. And thanks for the offer to help! I'm happy to keep trying until I don't run into any bugs. 😉

techalchemy added a commit to techalchemy/pew that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2018
- Use native ctypes for parent process traversal
- Addresses issues raised in pypa/pipenv#1587
  and microsoft/vscode-python#978
- Improves speed on windows
- Allows pipenv to remove vendored psutil which sometimes fails to find
linked python dlls
techalchemy added a commit to techalchemy/pew that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2018
- Use native ctypes for parent process traversal
- Addresses issues raised in pypa/pipenv#1587
  and microsoft/vscode-python#978
- Improves speed on windows
- Allows pipenv to remove vendored psutil which sometimes fails to find
linked python dlls
@brettcannon brettcannon self-assigned this Mar 12, 2018
@brettcannon
Copy link
Member Author

This seems to be working now so we can consider adding support for this.

@brettcannon brettcannon removed their assignment Mar 13, 2018
techalchemy added a commit to techalchemy/pew that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2018
- Use native ctypes for parent process traversal
- Addresses issues raised in pypa/pipenv#1587
  and microsoft/vscode-python#978
- Improves speed on windows
- Allows pipenv to remove vendored psutil which sometimes fails to find
linked python dlls
techalchemy added a commit to techalchemy/pew that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
- Use native ctypes for parent process traversal
- Addresses issues raised in pypa/pipenv#1587
  and microsoft/vscode-python#978
- Improves speed on windows
- Allows pipenv to remove vendored psutil which sometimes fails to find
linked python dlls
@brettcannon
Copy link
Member Author

And if we choose not to do this then we should provide a setting for specifying the path to pipenv.

@brettcannon brettcannon changed the title Update pipenv support to use -m Update pipenv support to use -m (or be able to specify the path to pipenv) Apr 26, 2018
@brettcannon brettcannon added this to the May 2018 milestone May 8, 2018
@brettcannon brettcannon removed this from the May 2018 milestone May 24, 2018
@brettcannon brettcannon changed the title Update pipenv support to use -m (or be able to specify the path to pipenv) be able to specify the path to pipenv Jun 6, 2018
@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently self-assigned this Jan 9, 2019
@DonJayamanne
Copy link

DonJayamanne commented Jan 11, 2019

@ericsnowcurrently
There are a few issues, with the needed code (or at least one) I must have accidentally approved this when submitting my review comments.

@DonJayamanne
Copy link

DonJayamanne commented Jan 11, 2019

Please check comments in PR
#3957 (comment)

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 13, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feature-request Request for new features or functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants