Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert log-web3-shim-usage.js to Typescript #23470

Closed
NiranjanaBinoy opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #23732
Closed

Convert log-web3-shim-usage.js to Typescript #23470

NiranjanaBinoy opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #23732
Assignees
Labels
release-12.6.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.6.0 team-extension-platform

Comments

@NiranjanaBinoy
Copy link
Contributor

NiranjanaBinoy commented Mar 13, 2024

Part of #23014

Convert the dependency file app/scripts/lib/rpc-method-middleware/handlers/log-web3-shim-usage.js (level 6) to typescript for contributing to metamask-controller.js.

@NiranjanaBinoy NiranjanaBinoy self-assigned this Mar 13, 2024
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the INVALID-ISSUE-TEMPLATE Issue's body doesn't match any issue template. label Mar 13, 2024
@NiranjanaBinoy NiranjanaBinoy removed the INVALID-ISSUE-TEMPLATE Issue's body doesn't match any issue template. label Mar 13, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2024
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->
Part of #23014 
Fixes #23470 

Converting the level 6 dependency file
`app/scripts/lib/rpc-method-middleware/handlers/log-web3-shim-usage.js`
to typescript for contributing to `metamask-controller.js`.
## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

[![Open in GitHub
Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/23732?quickstart=1)

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to this page...
2.
3.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the release-12.7.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.7.0 label Oct 8, 2024
@gauthierpetetin gauthierpetetin added release-12.6.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.6.0 and removed release-12.7.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.7.0 labels Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-12.6.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.6.0 team-extension-platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants