Ether-less Confirm TX Screens (Pure Function Calls)

[cjeria]

Dan commented:

Pure Function Calls

Not all transactions have ether implicitly attached to them. Often, the transaction really is about the Data. For those, the big header (about 30% of the view) would be dedicated to showing $0.00 0.0000 ether.

For cases when there is no ether being sent, and there is data associated with the transaction, and we are able to retrieve a function name from the on-chain registry, I strongly feel we should show the function name as a primary label on the confirmation screen. It is clearly the most useful information we could show the user.

[cjeria]

Possibly detect pure function calls (etherless actions) and swap out the body components with something that makes more sense with this specific type of function call.

[bdresser]

as discussed today, this can probably follow the designs in #11 closely, just need to replace the $/ETH value with a text treatment of the function call or something along those lines

user will still need to pay gas & would probably like the additional stuff in the data tab.

[bdresser]

this will be handled as part of #80