Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(doc) Update tx_broadcast explanation #370

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 13, 2019

Conversation

AlexCato
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, only 'self' works until the other options for tx_broadcast are implemented. Update the docs accordingly, because there was someone wondering on IRC today why his transaction failed to broadcast; the reason was he changed this setting, which currently only works for 'self'.

If the other options are implemented (tagging #368 ), this documentation should be changed along with it.

Currently, only 'self' works until the other options for tx_broadcast are implemented. Update the docs accordingly, because there was someone wondering on IRC today why his transaction failed to broadcast; the reason was he changed this setting, which currently only works for 'self'.

If the other options are implemented (tagging JoinMarket-Org#368 ), this documentation should be changed along with it.
jmclient/jmclient/configure.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Compatible bitcoin node implementations might be used as well, so it's not necessarily bitcoin core.
Copy link
Member

@kristapsk kristapsk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK a7cc1e8

@chris-belcher chris-belcher merged commit a7cc1e8 into JoinMarket-Org:master Jul 13, 2019
chris-belcher added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2019
a7cc1e8 Change 'bitcoin core' to 'bitcoin node' (AlexCato)
99c0c70 (doc) Update tx_broadcast explanation (AlexCato)

Tree-SHA512: afff2a0506610df37d82dda4550345179ea90d04a0ee51efbe5fe31ef068bc915f31a2f46759bc884184ac817c277430b8518736eeb96d30456d7b844b9258d3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants