Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The basic window interface for the bibliography consistency check #12086

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Donald-0017
Copy link

… been created and the next step is now underway.

Describe the changes you have made here: what, why, ...
Link the issue that will be closed, e.g., "Closes #333". If your PR closes a koppor issue, link it using its URL, e.g., "Closes koppor#47".

Mandatory checks

  • I own the copyright of the code submitted and I licence it under the MIT license
  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)
  • Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
  • Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

… been created and the next step is now underway.
@calixtus
Copy link
Member

I don't get it. What is this going to be?

You neither did set up your workspace according to our guide nor did you consider our dev docs and contribution guide. Please take a look at devdocs.jabref.org .

Please explain what this pr should achieve and what issue will be solved.

Copy link
Collaborator

@subhramit subhramit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please refrain from contributing to larger open-source projects before going through their contribution guidelines, and also when you have no idea about what you are doing at all. Asking questions is better than blindly using AI.

Comment on lines +54 to +59
Button saveButton = new Button("Save Entry");
saveButton.setOnAction(e -> {
// Here you would add logic to save the entry changes
String title = titleField.getText();
String author = authorField.getText();
System.out.println("Entry saved: " + title + " by " + author);
Copy link
Collaborator

@subhramit subhramit Oct 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No effort at all.

@subhramit
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing PR due to excessive and blind AI usage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reset of all preferences should be accessible through Options/Preferences Code for icons
3 participants